Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): move starknet_api dep to root toml #260

Conversation

dorimedini-starkware
Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware commented Aug 1, 2024

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator Author

dorimedini-starkware commented Aug 1, 2024

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @dorimedini-starkware and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.49%. Comparing base (a7cd678) to head (16666b7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                                   Coverage Diff                                    @@
##           08-01-chore_ci_move_papyrus_base_layer_dep_to_root_toml     #260   +/-   ##
========================================================================================
  Coverage                                                    76.48%   76.49%           
========================================================================================
  Files                                                          310      310           
  Lines                                                        34098    34098           
  Branches                                                     34098    34098           
========================================================================================
+ Hits                                                         26081    26082    +1     
  Misses                                                        5751     5751           
+ Partials                                                      2266     2265    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 08-01-chore_ci_move_papyrus_base_layer_dep_to_root_toml branch from ad16234 to 1467b3f Compare August 1, 2024 12:29
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 08-01-chore_ci_move_starknet_api_dep_to_root_toml branch from 66ce3f2 to 3646ace Compare August 1, 2024 12:29
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Benchmark movements:
tree_computation_flow performance regressed!
tree_computation_flow time: [34.696 ms 35.231 ms 35.812 ms]
change: [+1.0051% +3.1496% +5.2545%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has regressed.
Found 13 outliers among 100 measurements (13.00%)
9 (9.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe

Copy link
Collaborator

@noaov1 noaov1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 23 of 23 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2024 16:06
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 08-01-chore_ci_move_papyrus_base_layer_dep_to_root_toml branch from 1467b3f to a7cd678 Compare August 5, 2024 07:19
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 08-01-chore_ci_move_starknet_api_dep_to_root_toml branch from 3646ace to 16666b7 Compare August 5, 2024 07:20
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 11, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants