refactor(component_interface_specs): prefix package and namespace with autoware

[esteve]

Description

prefix package and namespace with autoware

Related links

Parent Issue:

• Reorganize the autoware.universe/common packages autoware#5077
• Prefix packages with autoware_ prefix and keep code in autoware namespace autoware#4569

How was this PR tested?

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[esteve]

This PR depends on tier4/tier4_ad_api_adaptor#126

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.63%. Comparing base (9bd0f77) to head (8700bca).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
system/autoware_default_adapi/src/vehicle_door.cpp	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
system/autoware_default_adapi/src/motion.cpp	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9094      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.63%   28.63%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1312     1313       +1     
  Lines      101648   101651       +3     
  Branches    39464    39465       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        29110    29110              
- Misses      69614    69617       +3     
  Partials     2924     2924              

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	28.17% <0.00%> (?)
total	28.63% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from 9bd0f77

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[isamu-takagi]

@esteve Thank you. Could you please update to use autoware::component_interface_specs::<module> instead of autoware::component_interface_specs::<module>_interface, as the original namespace has become redundant with the addition of the package name? Or I'll update it next week when I can work on it.

[esteve]

@isamu-takagi thanks for the review. I've moved this PR back to draft so that I'll make the changes you requested.

[esteve]

@isamu-takagi this is now ready for review again

[isamu-takagi]

Thank you. I checked autonomous driving using the planning simulator.

[SakodaShintaro]

Sorry, I missed your comment #9094 (comment)

[SakodaShintaro]

I have confirmed that logging_simulator with sample_rosbag works well.
LGTM for localization and map.

[esteve]

@isamu-takagi @SakodaShintaro thank you very much for your review

@xmfcx @mitsudome-r given that @isamu-takagi approved this PR and he's one of the maintainers of the autoware_component_interface_specs package, would it be ok to merge this PR without waiting for all the other reviewers who are code owners of downstream packages? Thanks

[xmfcx]

Combined with:

• refactor(autoware_iv_external_api_adaptor): update component_interface_specs dependency tier4/tier4_ad_api_adaptor#126

On my machine, I was able to build and test successfully.
Summary: 246 packages finished [16min 40s]

Even if the codebuild CI fails, we can merge this.

[xmfcx]

@mitsudome-r with:

• ci(build-and-test): reduce cores used by colcon build #9166

The CI has passed.