chore: refactor retdata macro to not require import of the type

[ArniStarkware]

No description provided.

[lotem-starkware]

This change is 

[ArniStarkware]

• chore: split transaction file part one fields dedicated file #1219
• chore: make the patricia_key and class_hash macros self contained #1465
• chore: refactor retdata macro to not require import of the type #1464 👈
• chore: make calldata macro self contained #1463
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @ArniStarkware and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.46%. Comparing base (b0cfe82) to head (1e2fe53).
Report is 495 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (b0cfe82) and HEAD (1e2fe53). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (b0cfe82)	HEAD (1e2fe53)
	3	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1464       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   74.18%   58.46%   -15.73%     
===========================================
  Files         359      143      -216     
  Lines       36240    17954    -18286     
  Branches    36240    17954    -18286     
===========================================
- Hits        26886    10497    -16389     
+ Misses       7220     6751      -469     
+ Partials     2134      706     -1428     

Flag	Coverage Δ
	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[MohammadNassar1]

Reviewed 13 of 13 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @ArniStarkware and @dorimedini-starkware)

a discussion (no related file):
Why it's not over main branch?

---

[ArniStarkware]

Previously, MohammadNassar1 (mohammad-starkware) wrote…

Why it's not over main branch?

To avoid conflicts with myself.

[MohammadNassar1]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, 2 of 2 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)