Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(blockifier): named values in test #1458

Merged

Conversation

dorimedini-starkware
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@lotem-starkware
Copy link
Contributor

This change is Reviewable

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.20%. Comparing base (b0cfe82) to head (9932c7b).
Report is 430 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1458      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.18%   70.20%   -3.99%     
==========================================
  Files         359       95     -264     
  Lines       36240    13048   -23192     
  Branches    36240    13048   -23192     
==========================================
- Hits        26886     9160   -17726     
+ Misses       7220     3488    -3732     
+ Partials     2134      400    -1734     
Flag Coverage Δ
?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 10-19-refactor_blockifier_format_retdata_in_executionfailed_and_panicinvalidate_errors branch from b98800b to 8921342 Compare October 19, 2024 16:54
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 10-19-test_blockifier_named_values_in_test branch from 3e385dd to 65fde15 Compare October 19, 2024 16:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@Yoni-Starkware Yoni-Starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @ilyalesokhin-starkware)

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware changed the base branch from 10-19-refactor_blockifier_format_retdata_in_executionfailed_and_panicinvalidate_errors to graphite-base/1458 October 20, 2024 07:20
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 10-19-test_blockifier_named_values_in_test branch from 65fde15 to 1ec23a9 Compare October 20, 2024 07:21
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware changed the base branch from graphite-base/1458 to main October 20, 2024 07:21
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 10-19-test_blockifier_named_values_in_test branch from 1ec23a9 to 9932c7b Compare October 20, 2024 07:21
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware merged commit c1d2427 into main Oct 20, 2024
11 checks passed
@ilyalesokhin-starkware
Copy link
Contributor

:lgtm:

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants