Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding back concentration ratio #12

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

0xddong
Copy link
Collaborator

@0xddong 0xddong commented Aug 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the liquidity simulation function to return an additional parameter for repo token concentration ratio, providing deeper insights into liquidity metrics.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved clarity in test cases by adjusting the unpacking of unused return values, ensuring better readability without impacting test logic.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@0xddong has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8cd56d and 677a08d.

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the Strategy contract and the TestUSDCSellRepoToken contract. The simulateLiquidity function has been updated to include a new output parameter, simulatedRepoTokenConcentrationRatio, and its logic adjusted accordingly. Additionally, the test contract has seen syntactical updates in the unpacking of return values from the simulateTransaction function, improving clarity by ignoring an unused return value.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/Strategy.sol Updated simulateLiquidity function to include simulatedRepoTokenConcentrationRatio as a new output parameter and adjusted its internal logic.
src/test/TestUSDCSellRepoToken.t.sol Modified unpacking of return values in multiple test functions by removing an unused second return value from simulateTransaction.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Strategy
    participant TermStrategy

    User->>Strategy: Call simulateLiquidity(repoToken, amount)
    Strategy->>TermStrategy: Invoke simulateTransaction(repoToken, amount)
    TermStrategy-->>Strategy: Return (weightedTimeToMaturity, simulatedRepoTokenConcentrationRatio, simulatedLiquidityRatio)
    Strategy-->>User: Return (simulatedWeightedMaturity, simulatedRepoTokenConcentrationRatio, simulatedLiquidityRatio)
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
New tokens dance, dispelling gloom.
A simulation’s clearer now,
With ratios, we take a bow.
Hopping forth, we cheer with glee,
For code that flows, oh joy to see! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@0xddong 0xddong marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2024 02:17
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6f4cc2 and b8cd56d.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Strategy.sol (2 hunks)
  • src/test/TestUSDCSellRepoToken.t.sol (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
src/test/TestUSDCSellRepoToken.t.sol (9)

94-94: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.


256-256: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.


264-264: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.


272-272: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.


280-280: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.


288-288: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.


296-296: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.


315-315: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.


405-405: LGTM! The unpacking change is syntactical.

The change to unpack the return value from simulateTransaction is purely syntactical and does not affect the logic.

src/Strategy.sol (2)

351-353: LGTM! The function signature change enhances functionality.

The addition of simulatedRepoTokenConcentrationRatio to the return values of simulateTransaction provides more detailed information about the concentration ratio.


387-395: LGTM! The conditional logic for concentration ratio is sensible.

The logic now calculates simulatedRepoTokenConcentrationRatio only when a valid repoToken is provided, which is appropriate for avoiding unnecessary calculations.

@0xddong 0xddong merged commit 0ae0dd2 into master Aug 22, 2024
0 of 4 checks passed
@0xddong 0xddong deleted the adding-back-concentration-ratio branch August 22, 2024 03:06
This was referenced Oct 2, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant