Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

save gas when editing offer by only overriding amount #18

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

aazhou1
Copy link

@aazhou1 aazhou1 commented Sep 6, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved efficiency in handling offers within term auctions by modifying existing offer objects instead of creating new ones.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced state management to streamline updates to offer amounts, reducing unnecessary object creation.

@aazhou1 aazhou1 self-assigned this Sep 6, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve a modification in the Strategy contract's handling of offers within a term auction. The implementation now updates an existing PendingOffer in the termAuctionListData.offers mapping by directly modifying the offerAmount field, rather than creating a new instance. This approach enhances efficiency by reusing existing structures while maintaining the original logic for auction terms.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/Strategy.sol Modified the handling of PendingOffer to update offerAmount directly instead of creating a new instance.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the meadow where offers bloom,
A rabbit hops, dispelling gloom.
With a flick of the ear, changes take flight,
Updating the offers, all feels just right.
Efficiency reigns, as we dance and play,
In our auction garden, brightening the day! 🐇✨

Tip

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2272739 and 8c75397.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Strategy.sol (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/Strategy.sol (1)

925-926: Optimization to modify existing offers approved.

The change to directly modify the offerAmount of an existing PendingOffer instead of creating a new one aligns with the PR objectives to save gas. This is a good optimization as it reduces the number of storage operations, which are costly in terms of gas.

Consider adding a comment here to clarify that this operation assumes the offerId already exists in the mapping, which should be validated or handled elsewhere in the contract to avoid potential errors.

@aazhou1 aazhou1 merged commit 47bb445 into master Sep 9, 2024
0 of 4 checks passed
@aazhou1 aazhou1 deleted the edit-offer-gas-savings branch September 9, 2024 18:37
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant