chore(starknet_batcher): set use_kzg_da flag in build block input

[ArniStarkware]

No description provided.

[reviewable-StarkWare]

This change is 

[ArniStarkware]

• chore(starknet_batcher): pass block info from consensus to batcher #2238 : 3 dependent PRs (#2267 , #2302 , #2409 )
• chore(starknet_consensus_manager): set proposer address in propose block input #2346
• chore(starknet_batcher): set use_kzg_da flag in build block input #2345 👈 (View in Graphite)
• chore(starknet_batcher): set temp gas prices in propose block input #2341
• chore(starknet_batcher): set block timestamp in build block input #2342
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 27.34%. Comparing base (e3165c4) to head (ef7066c).
Report is 676 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/starknet_api/src/block.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2345       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   40.10%   27.34%   -12.77%     
===========================================
  Files          26      119       +93     
  Lines        1895    14036    +12141     
  Branches     1895    14036    +12141     
===========================================
+ Hits          760     3838     +3078     
- Misses       1100     9863     +8763     
- Partials       35      335      +300     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[alonh5]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @ArniStarkware)

[matan-starkware]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, 1 of 1 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @ArniStarkware)

---

crates/sequencing/papyrus_consensus_orchestrator/src/sequencer_consensus_context.rs line 175 at r4 (raw file):

                    now.timestamp().try_into().expect("Failed to convert timestamp"),
                ),
                use_kzg_da: true,

Will this become variable in the future? If so where does the info come from?

Code quote:

                use_kzg_da: true,

[alonh5]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, 1 of 1 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @matan-starkware)

---

crates/sequencing/papyrus_consensus_orchestrator/src/sequencer_consensus_context.rs line 175 at r4 (raw file):

Previously, matan-starkware wrote…

Will this become variable in the future? If so where does the info come from?

This should always be true unless the blob data price will be higher than regular data storage, which could happen. Hard coding true for now is fine.

[ArniStarkware]

Merge activity

• Dec 3, 7:31 AM EST: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Dec 3, 7:33 AM EST: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
• Dec 3, 7:52 AM EST: A user merged this pull request with Graphite.