Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refine Keepers specific notations #2

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 6 additions & 6 deletions Rootlog_V2.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -614,9 +614,9 @@ The Keepers in Iron's Faction Board is its Relics.
- `t_f` = Figure relic token
- `t_t` = Tablet relic token
- `t_j` = Jewelry relic token
- `b_f` = Waystation, figure side up
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we keep these three in as well? I don't like the idea of requiring people to notate which waystation side is down. So, it would be, b_f means figure side up, unknown side down, and b_f_<x> means a specific waystation side is down, and we know what it is.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good spot. Yes, we can keep both notations.

- `b_t` = Waystation, tablet side up
- `b_j` = Waystation, jewelry side up
- `b_f_t` = Waystation, figure side up, tablet side down
- `b_t_j` = Waystation, tablet side up, jewelry side down
- `b_j_f` = Waystation, jewelry side up, figure side down
- `#faith` or `B#faith` = Faithful retainer card (when they're removed from the game, notate that they're discarded)

#### Retinue Locations
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ See Cards section above. These abbreviations are not necessary, but can optional
- `w->5+6+12` *Recruit one warrior each to clearings 5, 6, and 12.*
- `h_E->A$4` *The Woodland Alliance hire the Last Dynasty hireling for the next four turns.*
- `%uh_V$->` *The Outcast loses a club.*
- `b_j->12` *The Keepers in Iron build a waystation.*
- `b_j_t->12` *The Keepers in Iron build a waystation.*
- `(3w+r)1->12` *Move 3 warriors and the raft from clearing 1 to clearing 12.*
- `(4Lw+2Lb_r)4->` *Remove 4 Lizard warriors and 2 Rabbit gardens from clearing 4.*
- `R#@*->A` *The Woodland Alliance uses Informants to draw an Ambush card at the end of their turn.*
Expand All @@ -748,9 +748,9 @@ Common sequences of multiple actions in a row.
- `Sp->9/(w+Ew+Lw)9->` *Furious Protector comes into town.*
- `#bankO->/w->$` *The Riverfolk use Export to gain a warrior in Payments. Note: Don't use the "craft" notation in this case, since the card isn't added to Crafted Improvements and the item isn't added to the faction board.*
- `%r->e/CXO12/(2Cw+3Ow)12->/$_O+$_C->h/++3` *The Vagrant Vagabond instigates a battle between the Marquise and the Riverfolk.*
- `t_t7_10_11->10/t_t10^2/#faith$_2->` - *The Keepers delve a relic (possibly foolishly).*
- `t_t7_10_11->10/t10^t_2_t/#faith$_2->` - *The Keepers delve a relic (possibly foolishly).*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What notation is t_2_t? The notation for flipping a relic is <relic token><Clearing>^<Number>, so I would expect only a number to be on the right side of the ^, unless I've forgotten some combination of notations here?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is to be more in line with the Corvids' flip notation.

- `h_Op->4/h_OXD4/3Dw4->` *The Flotilla battles the Duchy.*
- `t_f5->$/++5` - *The Keepers recover a 3 point relic which also completes a relic column.*
- `t_3_f5->$/++5` - *The Keepers recover a 3 point relic which also completes a relic column.*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same question here about t_3_f5; maybe I'm missing something!

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You didn't miss something. I forgot to edit the part about optional notation for relic value, which I have just rectified. The t_f_3 notation creates a problem when reading a recover action like t_f_35->$. I know that the current version of the Keepers notation is to infer the value of the relic from a subsequent score points action. I think that it makes the notation less readable.

- `#^P/?Pt3^t_e/#C->P` *The Marquise guesses the Corvids' plot (incorrectly, oh well) using Exposure.*
- `XC9/R#C->/2Cw9->2/(2w+Cb_s)9->/++` *The Marquise uses Field Hospitals after being attacked.*
- `#false$->/3Dw8->9/t9^t_b/3Dw9->/++3` *Corvids play False Orders into a bomb. D:*
Expand Down