Refine Keepers specific notations #2
Conversation
| @@ -614,9 +614,9 @@ The Keepers in Iron's Faction Board is its Relics. | |||
| - `t_f` = Figure relic token | |||
| - `t_t` = Tablet relic token | |||
| - `t_j` = Jewelry relic token | |||
| - `b_f` = Waystation, figure side up | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could we keep these three in as well? I don't like the idea of requiring people to notate which waystation side is down. So, it would be, b_f means figure side up, unknown side down, and b_f_<x> means a specific waystation side is down, and we know what it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good spot. Yes, we can keep both notations.
| @@ -748,9 +748,9 @@ Common sequences of multiple actions in a row. | |||
| - `Sp->9/(w+Ew+Lw)9->` *Furious Protector comes into town.* | |||
| - `#bankO->/w->$` *The Riverfolk use Export to gain a warrior in Payments. Note: Don't use the "craft" notation in this case, since the card isn't added to Crafted Improvements and the item isn't added to the faction board.* | |||
| - `%r->e/CXO12/(2Cw+3Ow)12->/$_O+$_C->h/++3` *The Vagrant Vagabond instigates a battle between the Marquise and the Riverfolk.* | |||
| - `t_t7_10_11->10/t_t10^2/#faith$_2->` - *The Keepers delve a relic (possibly foolishly).* | |||
| - `t_t7_10_11->10/t10^t_2_t/#faith$_2->` - *The Keepers delve a relic (possibly foolishly).* | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What notation is t_2_t? The notation for flipping a relic is <relic token><Clearing>^<Number>, so I would expect only a number to be on the right side of the ^, unless I've forgotten some combination of notations here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is to be more in line with the Corvids' flip notation.
| - `h_Op->4/h_OXD4/3Dw4->` *The Flotilla battles the Duchy.* | ||
| - `t_f5->$/++5` - *The Keepers recover a 3 point relic which also completes a relic column.* | ||
| - `t_3_f5->$/++5` - *The Keepers recover a 3 point relic which also completes a relic column.* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same question here about t_3_f5; maybe I'm missing something!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You didn't miss something. I forgot to edit the part about optional notation for relic value, which I have just rectified. The t_f_3 notation creates a problem when reading a recover action like t_f_35->$. I know that the current version of the Keepers notation is to infer the value of the relic from a subsequent score points action. I think that it makes the notation less readable.
Related to Vagabottos/RootlogParser#22