Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: report stream error for create streaming jobs #13108

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

yezizp2012
Copy link
Member

@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 commented Oct 27, 2023

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Resolve #11374 , related #15179 .

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@kwannoel kwannoel self-requested a review November 1, 2023 03:10
@BugenZhao
Copy link
Member

May I ask is this related to #12996 (comment)?

@BugenZhao BugenZhao self-requested a review November 1, 2023 03:15
@yezizp2012
Copy link
Member Author

May I ask is this related to #12996 (comment)?

Yes, it is. And I tried to maintain a mechanism in local barrier manager to distinguish the root cause error, but failed. 🥵 Any ideas?

@kwannoel
Copy link
Contributor

kwannoel commented Nov 1, 2023

Do we have some test scenarios for it?

May I ask is this related to #12996 (comment)?

Yes, it is. And I tried to maintain a mechanism in local barrier manager to distinguish the root cause error, but failed. 🥵 Any ideas?

Can we:

  1. Collect all errors.
  2. Ignore internal channel errors

Is that sufficient? It may not cover all propagated errors, but I think it's most common.

#12996 (comment)

@yezizp2012
Copy link
Member Author

Do we have some test scenarios for it?

May I ask is this related to #12996 (comment)?

Yes, it is. And I tried to maintain a mechanism in local barrier manager to distinguish the root cause error, but failed. 🥵 Any ideas?

Can we:

  1. Collect all errors.
  2. Ignore internal channel errors

Is that sufficient? It may not cover all propagated errors, but I think it's most common.

#12996 (comment)

Yes, that's exactly what I tried. see #12996 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2024

This PR has been open for 60 days with no activity. Could you please update the status? Feel free to ping a reviewer if you are waiting for review.

Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Feb 22, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 3 secrets following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secrets in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
9425213 Triggered Generic Password ee60ab8 ci/scripts/regress-test.sh View secret
9425213 Triggered Generic Password ee60ab8 ci/scripts/e2e-source-test.sh View secret
9425213 Triggered Generic Password ee60ab8 ci/scripts/e2e-source-test.sh View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate these secrets.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Our GitHub checks need improvements? Share your feedbacks!

@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2024 09:22
@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 requested a review from wenym1 February 29, 2024 09:16
Copy link
Contributor

@wenym1 wenym1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rest LGTM

src/meta/src/barrier/progress.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
if let Some(t) = tables.get(&table.id)
&& let Ok(StreamJobStatus::Creating) = t.get_stream_job_status()
{
fn check_table_creating(tables: &BTreeMap<TableId, Table>, table: &Table) -> MetaResult<()> {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cc @kwannoel , Before the table in Foreground is marked as created, if recovery occurs, it will be cleaned up by clean_dirty_tables. Changed this function to check and return an error if it's cleaned.
The corner case was found in this run: https://buildkite.com/risingwavelabs/pull-request/builds/43296#018df426-a3da-48cc-af24-f09eb061a320

@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit d00d286 Feb 29, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 deleted the feat/ddl-error-report branch February 29, 2024 12:40
Copy link
Member

@BugenZhao BugenZhao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug(sink): unclear error message
4 participants