-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Common configuration format for representing existing Motis-Instances #276
Comments
Basically, MOTIS has already a configuration format (the
Basic information such as endpoint address, MOTIS version, etc. should obviously also be included. |
Basically, MOTIS delivers all active routes unter the |
Then I wouldn't add it to a config file, as the software communicating with the motis-server can request them on it's own.
Yep.
Can these timetables overlap in the timespan they provide? If so I would include it in the config yes.
Agree. Would you mind if I create an issue at https://github.com/public-transport/transport-apis to discuss it there as well and create a draft on how that config could look like for further discussions? |
Yes. This is the case for the demo instance (Switzerland, Germany, Netherlands). They can but they don't have to overlap. You could also mix this years timetable and next years timetable. I think ideally, this would also be something that MOTIS communicates via the API but for now it's easier to include it in the client config. Feel free to discuss this topic in the transport-apis repo. |
When dealing with our two different Motis-instances, I faced the challenge on how to save two different configuration files. I thought about having two configuration files, so I can tell our MOTIS-Client to choose the one or the other. Additionally there is the possibility to add some information about e.g. the loaded data of the MOTIS-instance into the client, so it already knows e.g. about the coverage. Before I come up with a format for this configuration file, I would like to discuss this, so maybe we can come up with a common format for configuration files, that can be used across different software, which communicates with MOTIS instances.
I did a similar thing for TRIAS-Clients and discussed the format here, where I would also specify the format and additionally we could collect configuration files of future public available instances.
What do you think? Any feedback or questions appreciated
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: