You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As part of my job I started to work on a library to communicate with Motis-Instances and came to the point that it would make sense to have configuration files. So instead of creating my own format I would like to discuss the format here and ideally upstream the specification to this repo instead. Compared to TRIA, Hafas, EFA, etc. I am not aware of any "official" MOTIS-Servers provided by a public transport provider, but there are public instances like https://europe.motis-project.de/.
If you have any additional aspects you would think about let me know in this issue. And if you would be fine adding the specification to this repository, I would similar to the TRIAS create a draft PR to discuss a proposed format.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So instead of creating my own format I would like to discuss the format here and ideally upstream the specification to this repo instead.
Sounds like a good idea! From transport-apis' perspective it makes sense to keep the format similar (within reason) to the other systems' formats.
Compared to TRIA, Hafas, EFA, etc. I am not aware of any "official" MOTIS-Servers provided by a public transport provider, but there are public instances like https://europe.motis-project.de/.
I think documenting almost any open or semi-open transport API that clients might want to consume is valuable! 👍
You might know about MOTIS: https://motis-project.de/
As part of my job I started to work on a library to communicate with Motis-Instances and came to the point that it would make sense to have configuration files. So instead of creating my own format I would like to discuss the format here and ideally upstream the specification to this repo instead. Compared to TRIA, Hafas, EFA, etc. I am not aware of any "official" MOTIS-Servers provided by a public transport provider, but there are public instances like https://europe.motis-project.de/.
I also created a upstream issue here: motis-project/motis#276
If you have any additional aspects you would think about let me know in this issue. And if you would be fine adding the specification to this repository, I would similar to the TRIAS create a draft PR to discuss a proposed format.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: