Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Communication: Allow user to save messages for later #9705

Merged
merged 59 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Fix Merge conflict

238e171
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Sign in for the full log view
Merged

Communication: Allow user to save messages for later #9705

Fix Merge conflict
238e171
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
GitHub Actions / H2 Tests failed Nov 26, 2024 in 0s

8442 passed, 1 failed and 2 skipped

Tests failed
Report exceeded GitHub limit of 65535 bytes and has been trimmed

Annotations

Check failure on line 183 in src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / H2 Tests

de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest ► testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack()

Failed test found in:
  build/test-results/test/TEST-de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.xml
Error:
  org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
Raw output
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
expected: 1L
 but was: 2L
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.clientConnectToArtemisSshServer(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:183)
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:116)
	at [email protected]/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:387)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1312)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1843)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1808)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:188)