Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Communication: Allow user to save messages for later #9705

Merged
merged 59 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Fix Merge conflict

238e171
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Sign in for the full log view
Merged

Communication: Allow user to save messages for later #9705

Fix Merge conflict
238e171
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
GitHub Actions / Junit Results failed Nov 26, 2024 in 0s

Junit Results

Junit Results ran 8445 in 1375.5130000000006 seconds 0 Errored, 1 Failed, 2 Skipped

Annotations

Check failure on line 0 in test

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

test#L0

Junit Results ran 8445 in 1375.5130000000006 seconds 0 Errored, 1 Failed, 2 Skipped

Check failure on line 115 in /home/runner/work/Artemis/Artemis/src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack()

Junit test testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack() failed org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
expected: 1L
 but was: 2L
Raw output
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
expected: 1L
 but was: 2L
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.clientConnectToArtemisSshServer(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:183)
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:116)
	at [email protected]/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:387)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1312)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1843)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1808)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:188)