Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Norwegian: updated 8 dot braille table for JAWS #9

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

josteinaj
Copy link
Contributor

Also fixed some of the Markdown.


* _Title translated_: Norwegian Braille - part 4
* _by_: [Huseby kompetansesenter - Statlig spesialpedagogisk senter for synshemmede](http://www.statped.no/Spraksider/In-English/)
* _published_: Oslo, 1995
* _language_: Norwegian
* _isbn_: 82-7740-002-0

[Table of contents](1995%20-%20Norsk%20Punktskrift%20-%20del%204.toc.md)
## [Table of contents](1995%20-%20Norsk%20Punktskrift%20-%20del%204.toc.md)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a mistake?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whops, yeah, good catch. I'll commit a fix...

@bertfrees
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure we should be including JAWS files. Aren't these mappings defined somewhere in a document?

@josteinaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

As far as I know they're not defined anywhere else. That's why I uploaded them initially, and there's significant changes in this newer version.

But I'll ask Lars if he knows about any proper documentation. I agree that would be better.

@bertfrees
Copy link
Member

@josteinaj Have you been in contact with Lars about this?

@josteinaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, no I haven't.

@tagerobert could you follow up this issue with Lars?

@josteinaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tage has retired and is not working at Statped any more. I won't have time to follow up this with Lars.

Should we just close this one?

@bertfrees
Copy link
Member

OK fine.

@egli
Copy link
Member

egli commented Oct 29, 2024

Can't we just merge? This seems still better than no documentation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants