added rewrite for route

[nxtCoder19]

updfate rewrite value to routes

[sourcery-ai]

PR Type: Enhancement

PR Summary: This pull request introduces the addition of a 'rewrite' property to route configurations within a specific router setup. The enhancement aims to update the rewrite value for routes, allowing for more flexible and dynamic routing capabilities.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.

• Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.

✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.

No details provided.

✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.

No details provided.

General suggestions:

• Ensure consistency in naming conventions across the codebase to avoid potential confusion. The addition of the 'rewrite' property uses different naming conventions ('rewrite' vs. 'reWrite'), which could lead to misunderstandings or errors in the future.
• Review the PR title and description for clarity and accuracy. The title 'added rewrite for route' succinctly describes the change, but the PR description 'updfate rewrite value to routes' contains a typo and could be more descriptive. Consider revising the description to clearly articulate the purpose and impact of the change.

src/apps/console/routes/_main+/$account+/$project+/$environment+/router+/$router+/routes/handle-route.tsx: Refactor to reduce complexity by modularizing route updates and minimizing inline expansions for improved maintainability.

While reviewing the proposed changes, I noticed that the modifications introduce additional complexity, particularly due to the inline expansion of the routes array within a deeply nested object structure. This not only increases the cognitive load required to understand the modifications but also introduces repetitive code patterns, which could potentially make future maintenance more challenging.

To enhance readability and maintainability, I suggest refactoring the code to reduce nesting and separate concerns. Specifically, extracting the logic for adding the rewrite property to routes and creating new routes into separate functions can make the code more modular. This approach not only simplifies understanding each piece of functionality independently but also helps in keeping the code DRY by eliminating repetitive patterns.

Here's a simplified example of how this could be achieved:

function addRewriteToRoute(route) {
    return { ...route, rewrite: route.rewrite };
}

function createNewRoute(val) {
    return {
        path: `/${val.path}`,
        app: val.app,
        port: parseInt(val.port, 10),
        rewrite: val.reWrite,
    };
}

function updateRouter(router, val) {
    const updatedRoutes = router.spec.routes?.map(addRewriteToRoute) || [];
    updatedRoutes.push(createNewRoute(val));

    return {
        ...router,
        spec: {
            ...router.spec,
            routes: updatedRoutes,
        },
    };
}

By adopting this approach, we can make the code less nested and more straightforward, thereby improving its maintainability and readability.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

---

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

[sourcery-ai]

nitpick (llm): The property rewrite is being added with a value from val.reWrite. It's important to ensure consistency in naming conventions. Here, rewrite is all lowercase, whereas reWrite uses camelCase. If this inconsistency is not intentional, consider aligning them to avoid potential confusion or bugs related to naming discrepancies.