-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/transaction from raw #65
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new public function Changes
Poem
Tip New featuresWalkthrough comment now includes:
Notes:
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/tron/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (1)
269-302
: Review: Test module forfrom_raw
method.The test module provides comprehensive tests for the
from_raw
method, covering different blockchain chains. This is crucial for ensuring the method's reliability across various scenarios. The tests appear to be well-structured and check for correct sender addresses, which is a key part of transaction validation.The test implementation is thorough and well-done. It's important to ensure that all edge cases and error scenarios are also tested, especially for the chains with
todo!()
in the main implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/tron/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/tron/mod.rs
Additional comments not posted (1)
packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (1)
196-210
: Skipping similar comment as the past comment is still valid.The past review comment on an outdated commit is still valid and applicable to the current code segment. Skipping generating a similar comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (1)
1-2
: LGTM!The removal of the unused import
use crate::chains::MATIC;
is approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (1)
196-214
: LGTM! Thefrom_raw
function is a well-structured and robust implementation.The
from_raw
function is a good addition to theTransaction
struct. It uses pattern matching to handle different chains and returns aResult
type for error handling, which are good practices. The placeholder cases for MATIC and BTC chains are clearly marked, indicating future implementation. The function enforces strict type safety by returning an error for invalid chains.Consider completing the implementation for MATIC and BTC chains in the future.
…at/transaction-from-raw
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/kos-mobile/src/lib.rs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/kos-mobile/src/lib.rs (3)
43-49
: Review of the KOSTransaction struct.The
KOSTransaction
struct is well-defined with fields forchain_id
,raw
,sender
, andsignature
. However, as noted in previous comments, thesignature
field is currently a placeholder. It's crucial to implement the signature retrieval logic to ensure the functionality is complete. Since this issue has been previously noted, ensure that the implementation is completed before merging.
52-63
: Review of the sign_transaction function.The
sign_transaction
function is designed to sign a transaction using aKOSAccount
. It correctly retrieves the chain, constructs a wallet, and signs the transaction. However, thesignature
field in the returnedKOSTransaction
is still marked withtodo!()
, which needs to be completed to fully realize the function's capabilities. This issue has been previously noted and should be addressed as a priority.
346-372
: Review of the should_sign_raw_transaction test case.The test case
should_sign_raw_transaction
is well-constructed and tests the critical functionality of thesign_transaction
function. It checks that the transaction signing process correctly matches expected values forchain_id
,sender
, andraw
transaction data. However, the effectiveness of this test is contingent upon the completion of the signature implementation in thesign_transaction
function. This issue has been previously noted and should be addressed to ensure the test's validity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- packages/kos-mobile/src/lib.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/bitcoin/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/bitcoin/transaction.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/ethereum/mod.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/klever_test.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/mod.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/requests.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/tron/mod.rs (5 hunks)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/tron/mod.rs
Additional comments not posted (7)
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/requests.rs (1)
87-87
: Approve addition of signature parameter.The addition of the
signature
parameter to themake_request
function is a thoughtful enhancement for handling transaction signatures. It's crucial to ensure that this new parameter integrates well with existing systems and does not introduce any regressions.Run the following script to verify the integration of the new parameter:
packages/kos-sdk/src/models.rs (1)
151-152
: Approve new methods and fields in Transaction struct.The addition of the
from_raw
method and thesignature
field, along with theget_signature
method, significantly enhances theTransaction
struct's capabilities. These additions are crucial for handling transactions more effectively in blockchain applications.Run the following script to verify the integration of the new methods and fields:
Also applies to: 189-192, 206-219
Verification successful
Integration of New Methods and Fields Verified
The
from_raw
method,signature
field, andget_signature
method are well-integrated into theTransaction
struct and are used across the codebase as expected. No issues were found with their integration.
- The
signature
field is present and used in multiple files.- The
get_signature
method is called inkos-mobile/src/lib.rs
.- The
from_raw
method is implemented and used inmodels.rs
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new methods and fields in the `Transaction` struct. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new methods and fields. rg --type rust -A 5 $'Transaction'Length of output: 77631
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/bitcoin/transaction.rs (1)
49-52
: Approve new get_signature method in BTCTransaction.The addition of the
get_signature
method to theBTCTransaction
class is a useful enhancement for retrieving the transaction signature. This method can be crucial for verification or logging purposes.Run the following script to verify the integration of the new method:
Verification successful
Integration of
get_signature
method verified.The
get_signature
method in theBTCTransaction
class is integrated and utilized within the codebase, confirming its functionality for retrieving transaction signatures.
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/bitcoin/transaction.rs
: Method definition.packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/bitcoin/mod.rs
: Method usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the `get_signature` method in the `BTCTransaction` class. # Test: Search for the class usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new method. rg --type rust -A 5 $'BTCTransaction'Length of output: 2349
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage of the `get_signature` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Occurrences of the `get_signature` method being called. rg --type rust 'get_signature' -A 3Length of output: 1378
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/klever_test.rs (1)
61-61
: Approved addition of the signature field.The addition of the
signature
field with a default value ofNone
is appropriate for the test setup. Ensure that the integration of this field is verified across other parts of the codebase where transactions are handled.Run the following script to verify the integration of the
signature
field:Verification successful
Integration of
signature
field verified successfully.The
signature
field is consistently integrated across the codebase, including transaction handling and related test cases. The field is present in various modules, ensuring comprehensive coverage and functionality. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the `signature` field across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `signature` field. Expect: Consistent handling across the codebase. rg --type rust -A 5 $'signature'Length of output: 42418
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/mod.rs (1)
106-107
: Approved enhancements in signature handling.The changes to encode the signature in base64 and include it in the
Transaction
struct are well-implemented. These enhancements improve the standardization and interoperability of transaction signatures. Verify that these changes integrate smoothly with the rest of the transaction processing logic.Run the following script to verify the integration of the signature handling:
Also applies to: 114-114, 217-217, 290-290, 297-297
Verification successful
Integration of Signature Handling Verified
The integration of the base64-encoded signature handling with the transaction processing logic is verified. The presence of tests in
klever_test.rs
that handle signature signing and verification indicates that the changes are well-integrated and tested. The enhancements improve the standardization and interoperability of transaction signatures as intended.
- The tests in
klever_test.rs
confirm the correct handling of signatures, including encoding and verification.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of signature handling across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `signature` field and base64 encoding. Expect: Consistent handling across the codebase. rg --type rust -A 5 $'signature|base64'Length of output: 43638
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for functions related to transaction creation, verification, and serialization in the klever module. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn $_($$$) -> $_ { $$$ let signature = base64::encode($_); $$$ }' packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/mod.rs # Search for functions that use the signature field in the klever module. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn $_($$$) -> $_ { $$$ signature: $_, $$$ }' packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/mod.rs # Check for tests related to signature handling in the klever module. rg --type rust 'signature' -A 5 packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/klever/klever_test.rsLength of output: 1278
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/bitcoin/mod.rs (1)
140-145
: Approve the changes with suggestions for signature handling.The addition of the
signature
field in theTransaction
struct and its handling in thesign
function are approved. However, consider handling theNone
case for signatures more explicitly rather than defaulting to an empty string. This could improve clarity and error handling in scenarios where a signature is expected but not present.Consider this modification to handle the
None
case more explicitly:- let signature = btc_tx.get_signature().unwrap_or("".to_string()); + let signature = btc_tx.get_signature().unwrap_or_else(|| { + log::warn("Transaction signature not available."); + "".to_string() + });Additionally, ensure that the integration of this new field is thoroughly tested, especially in scenarios where the signature might be absent.
packages/kos-sdk/src/chains/ethereum/mod.rs (1)
142-142
: Approve the changes with a suggestion for further verification.The addition of the
signature
field in theTransaction
struct and its handling in thesign
function are approved. Ensure that the integration of this new field is thoroughly tested, especially in scenarios where the signature might be absent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/kos-mobile/src/lib.rs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/kos-mobile/src/lib.rs (3)
43-49
: Review of the KOSTransaction structThe
KOSTransaction
struct is well-defined with appropriate fields for blockchain transactions. The fields includechain_id
,raw
,sender
, andsignature
. This struct is crucial for encapsulating transaction details in a structured format.Given the previous comments about the
signature
field being a placeholder, it's important to verify that the implementation now correctly handles the signature. The AI-generated summary indicates that thesignature
field is now populated with the actual signature retrieved from the signed transaction, which addresses the previous concerns.
51-67
: Review of the sign_transaction functionThis function is a key addition to the module, enabling the signing of transactions using a
KOSAccount
. The function performs several operations:
- Retrieves the blockchain chain associated with the account.
- Constructs a wallet from the account's private key.
- Creates a transaction object from the provided raw data.
- Signs the transaction using the wallet.
- Returns a
KOSTransaction
instance containing the transaction details.The implementation appears robust, with proper error handling and use of the
Result
type for error propagation. The function correctly populates theKOSTransaction
struct, including thesignature
field, which was previously a concern.Given the previous comments and the current implementation, it seems the function now fully realizes its capabilities by properly handling the signature. This aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance transaction signing functionalities.
348-376
: Review of the should_sign_raw_transaction test caseThe test case
should_sign_raw_transaction
is designed to validate the functionality of thesign_transaction
method. It checks that the transaction signing process correctly matches expected values forchain_id
,sender
, andraw
transaction data.The test setup involves:
- Generating a wallet from a mnemonic.
- Signing a transaction.
- Asserting that the returned transaction details match expected values.
This test is well-constructed and covers the critical functionality of the
sign_transaction
function. It ensures that the new functionality behaves as intended, particularly in terms of the transaction'schain_id
,sender
,raw
, andsignature
.Given the previous comments about the effectiveness of this test being contingent upon the completion of the signature implementation, it appears that this issue has been addressed as the test now includes assertions for the
signature
field.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Transaction
object for TRX.Transaction
struct for creating instances from raw data across multiple blockchain types.sign_transaction
function to enable signing of transactions within the KOSAccount context.Bug Fixes
from_raw
method to prevent invalid chain processing.