docs(user, util): address broken links #2252
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The broken link itself has been discovered by @e-io. Co-authored-by: PM <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2252 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 63 63
Lines 6852 6852
Branches 1260 1260
=========================================
Hits 6852 6852 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
vytas7
changed the title
Co-authored-by: Federico Caselli <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The broken link itself has been discovered by @e-io.
I haven't been able to find what inserts the_asynciomodule in the index. But it isn't easy to find that index anyway, is it?Edit: I've found the culprit for that
_asyncioin the index. We had aliased functions directly from the stdlib, so I went on to soft-deprecate them for now. I'll create an issue to deprecate them (but there is probably no rush to do so.)