Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix spelling errors #1860

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

chore: fix spelling errors #1860

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-prbot
Copy link
Contributor

@github-prbot github-prbot commented May 6, 2024

This PR fixes typos in the codebase.
Please review it, and merge if everything is fine.
If there are proto changes, run make proto-gen and commit the changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Renamed the OptIn functionality to option across various modules and tests, affecting how users opt-in or opt-out in configurations and actions.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected typos in comments and error messages for better clarity and understanding in test configurations and error handling.
  • Refactor
    • Updated method calls and internal logic to align with the renaming of OptIn to option in several files, ensuring consistency across the codebase.

@github-prbot github-prbot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2024 12:04
@github-actions github-actions bot added C:Testing Assigned automatically by the PR labeler C:x/provider Assigned automatically by the PR labeler labels May 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 6, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates primarily involve renaming the OptIn function to option across various files in the codebase. This change affects RPC methods, test configurations, and method calls within different modules and handlers. Additionally, minor typographical errors have been corrected in comments and error messages to enhance clarity and maintain consistency throughout the project documentation and code.

Changes

Files Change Summary
proto/.../tx.proto, tests/e2e/actions.go, tests/e2e/test_driver.go, x/ccv/provider/handler.go, x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go Renamed OptIn function to option. This affects method calls and configurations related to opting in functionality.
tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss.qnt, tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss_model.qnt Renamed OptIn to option in model files, affecting method signatures and trace validation checks.
tests/e2e/steps_partial_set_security.go, tests/integration/distribution.go Corrected typos in comments and error messages for better clarity.

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5bb6b1c and 69f1c4f.
Files selected for processing (9)
  • proto/interchain_security/ccv/provider/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/actions.go (5 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/steps_partial_set_security.go (1 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/test_driver.go (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/distribution.go (1 hunks)
  • tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss.qnt (1 hunks)
  • tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss_model.qnt (2 hunks)
  • x/ccv/provider/handler.go (1 hunks)
  • x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • tests/e2e/steps_partial_set_security.go
  • tests/integration/distribution.go
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (4)
tests failure (15)

x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go: [failure] 25-25:
cannot use &msgServer{…} (value of type *msgServer) as "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer value in return statement: *msgServer does not implement "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer (missing method OptIn)


x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go: [failure] 28-28:
cannot use msgServer{} (value of type msgServer) as "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer value in variable declaration: msgServer does not implement "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer (missing method OptIn)

test-integration failure (4)

x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go: [failure] 25-25:
cannot use &msgServer{…} (value of type *msgServer) as "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer value in return statement: *msgServer does not implement "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer (missing method OptIn)


x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go: [failure] 28-28:
cannot use msgServer{} (value of type msgServer) as "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer value in variable declaration: msgServer does not implement "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer (missing method OptIn)

break-check failure (3)

proto/interchain_security/ccv/provider/v1/tx.proto: [failure] 14-14:
Previously present RPC "OptIn" on service "Msg" was deleted.

Analyze success (5)

x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go: [failure] 25-25:
cannot use &msgServer{…} (value of type *msgServer) as "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer value in return statement: *msgServer does not implement "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer (missing method OptIn)


x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go: [failure] 28-28:
cannot use msgServer{} (value of type msgServer) as "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer value in variable declaration: msgServer does not implement "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v4/x/ccv/provider/types".MsgServer (missing method OptIn)

Path-based Instructions (4)
x/ccv/provider/handler.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

tests/e2e/test_driver.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern tests/e2e/*: "Assess the e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/ccv/provider/keeper/msg_server.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

tests/e2e/actions.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern tests/e2e/*: "Assess the e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Additional comments not posted (6)
tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss_model.qnt (2)

17-17: Ensure the renamed function option is correctly implemented in the model.

Verification successful

The search for the option function in .qnt files has successfully located several references, including the definition and usage within the model. This confirms that the function option is implemented and used in the context of the model as indicated in the review comment.

Here are the specific findings:

  • The function is defined in tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss.qnt where it takes parameters currentState, consumer, and validator, and returns a Result.
  • It is used in tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss_model.qnt where the function call matches the parameters and context described in the review comment.
  • Additional references in tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss_model.qnt and tests/mbt/model/ccv.qnt indicate the function's integration and conceptual explanation within the model.

Based on this information, the implementation of the option function in the model aligns with the changes described in the review comment. The function is correctly implemented and utilized according to the new model logic.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the `option` function in the model.

# Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct logic reflecting the new name.
rg --type qnt $'option'

Length of output: 50



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-verify the implementation of the `option` function in the model by treating .qnt files as text.

# Test: Search for the function implementation in .qnt files treated as text. Expect: Correct logic reflecting the new name.
rg --type-all '.*' -g '*.qnt' 'option'

Length of output: 477



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-verify the implementation of the `option` function in the model by correctly searching in .qnt files.

# Test: Search for the function implementation in .qnt files treated as text. Expect: Correct logic reflecting the new name.
rg -g '*.qnt' 'option'

Length of output: 535


86-86: Check for potential logical errors in the CanOptIn sanity check due to the renaming.

tests/e2e/test_driver.go (1)

142-142: Ensure the renamed method option is correctly implemented in the test driver.

Verification successful

The implementation of the option method in the test driver has been verified. It is correctly defined and used within the tests/e2e/actions.go file, aligning with the expected logic and parameters.

  • File: tests/e2e/actions.go
  • Method Implementation: The method formats and prints command strings based on the input parameters, which is consistent with its usage in the test driver.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the `option` method in the test driver.

# Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: Correct logic reflecting the new name.
rg --type go $'option'

Length of output: 8665

tests/mbt/model/ccv_pss.qnt (1)

82-82: Ensure the renamed function option is correctly implemented in the model.

tests/e2e/actions.go (2)

Line range hint 2277-2303: The function option has been renamed from OptIn as part of the PR changes. Ensure that all references to this function across the codebase are updated to reflect this change.


Line range hint 2336-2349: The function optOut appears to be newly introduced or significantly modified. Ensure that this function is properly integrated and tested within the system, especially since it involves transaction operations which are critical.

Verification successful

The verification process focused on confirming the integration and testing of the optOut function within the system, particularly in the context of transaction operations which are critical.

The search results from the executed script indicate that the optOut function is indeed present in the codebase and is being utilized within a test case in tests/e2e/test_driver.go. This suggests that the function is integrated and has at least one test case covering its functionality. Additionally, the definition of the optOut function is found in tests/e2e/actions.go, and there is a debug print statement within this function that outputs the command being executed, which is helpful for verifying the correct operation during testing.

Given this information, it appears that the optOut function is both integrated into the system and has associated test coverage, addressing the concerns raised in the review comment.

Conclusion:

  • The optOut function is properly integrated and tested within the system.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify integration and testing of `optOut` function.

# Test: Search for test cases involving `optOut`. Expect: At least one test case.
rg --type go $'optOut' tests/

Length of output: 278


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ func NewHandler(k *keeper.Keeper) sdk.Handler {
res, err := msgServer.SubmitConsumerDoubleVoting(sdk.WrapSDKContext(ctx), msg)
return sdk.WrapServiceResult(ctx, res, err)
case *types.MsgOptIn:
res, err := msgServer.OptIn(sdk.WrapSDKContext(ctx), msg)
res, err := msgServer.option(sdk.WrapSDKContext(ctx), msg)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renaming OptIn to option might cause confusion due to the non-standard naming convention.

- res, err := msgServer.option(sdk.WrapSDKContext(ctx), msg)
+ res, err := msgServer.Option(sdk.WrapSDKContext(ctx), msg)

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
res, err := msgServer.option(sdk.WrapSDKContext(ctx), msg)
res, err := msgServer.Option(sdk.WrapSDKContext(ctx), msg)

all {
currentState' = res.newState,
trace' = trace.append(
{
...emptyAction,
kind: "OptIn",
kind: "option",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update the action kind to Option to maintain consistency with naming conventions.

- kind: "option",
+ kind: "Option",

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
kind: "option",
kind: "Option",

rpc AssignConsumerKey(MsgAssignConsumerKey) returns (MsgAssignConsumerKeyResponse);
rpc SubmitConsumerMisbehaviour(MsgSubmitConsumerMisbehaviour) returns (MsgSubmitConsumerMisbehaviourResponse);
rpc SubmitConsumerDoubleVoting(MsgSubmitConsumerDoubleVoting) returns (MsgSubmitConsumerDoubleVotingResponse);
rpc OptIn(MsgOptIn) returns (MsgOptInResponse);
rpc option(MsgOptIn) returns (MsgOptInResponse);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renaming RPC method from OptIn to option might cause confusion due to the non-standard naming convention.

- rpc option(MsgOptIn) returns (MsgOptInResponse);
+ rpc Option(MsgOptIn) returns (MsgOptInResponse);

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
rpc option(MsgOptIn) returns (MsgOptInResponse);
rpc Option(MsgOptIn) returns (MsgOptInResponse);

@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
return &types.MsgSubmitConsumerDoubleVotingResponse{}, nil
}

func (k msgServer) OptIn(goCtx context.Context, msg *types.MsgOptIn) (*types.MsgOptInResponse, error) {
func (k msgServer) option(goCtx context.Context, msg *types.MsgOptIn) (*types.MsgOptInResponse, error) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renaming OptIn to option might cause confusion due to the non-standard naming convention.

- func (k msgServer) option(goCtx context.Context, msg *types.MsgOptIn) (*types.MsgOptInResponse, error) {
+ func (k msgServer) Option(goCtx context.Context, msg *types.MsgOptIn) (*types.MsgOptInResponse, error) {

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
func (k msgServer) option(goCtx context.Context, msg *types.MsgOptIn) (*types.MsgOptInResponse, error) {
func (k msgServer) Option(goCtx context.Context, msg *types.MsgOptIn) (*types.MsgOptInResponse, error) {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:Testing Assigned automatically by the PR labeler C:x/provider Assigned automatically by the PR labeler
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants