-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#2976: Senior Official and federal agency field changes for non federal agencies - [BACKUP] #3008
Merged
zandercymatics
merged 5 commits into
main
from
za/2976-senior-official-federal-agency-changes
Nov 1, 2024
Merged
#2976: Senior Official and federal agency field changes for non federal agencies - [BACKUP] #3008
zandercymatics
merged 5 commits into
main
from
za/2976-senior-official-federal-agency-changes
Nov 1, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox za. |
zandercymatics
changed the title
[DRAFT] #2976: Senior official + federal agency changes for portfolio
[DRAFT] #2976: Senior official + federal agency changes for portfolio - [BACKUP]
Oct 29, 2024
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox za. |
zandercymatics
changed the title
[DRAFT] #2976: Senior official + federal agency changes for portfolio - [BACKUP]
[DRAFT] #2976: Senior Official and federal agency field changes for non federal agencies - [BACKUP]
Oct 29, 2024
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox za. |
zandercymatics
changed the title
[DRAFT] #2976: Senior Official and federal agency field changes for non federal agencies - [BACKUP]
#2976: Senior Official and federal agency field changes for non federal agencies - [BACKUP]
Oct 30, 2024
zandercymatics
requested review from
lizpearl,
therealslimhsiehdy,
Matt-Spence,
CocoByte,
rachidatecs,
dave-kennedy-ecs,
erinysong and
asaki222
October 30, 2024 20:22
asaki222
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! I Like the descriptions.
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox za. |
zandercymatics
deleted the
za/2976-senior-official-federal-agency-changes
branch
November 1, 2024 18:32
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ticket
Resolves #2976
Changes
On the portfolio page:
Context for reviewers
NOTE: This PR only changes the portfolio page.
This PR does three things on the Portfolio page in django admin:
federal agency
field gets set to "Non-Federal Agency" and the senior official is cleaned upif organization type changes to any non federal options (on save), the federal agency should be cleared, set to non-federal agency,and hidden. When this federal agency clears the SO for that federal agency should no longer show up
Setup
Navigate to the portfolio page in django admin and swap between the organization type federal and not federal. Ensure that the three things outlined above occur.
The steps to do so are as follows (and what to look for):
Code Review Verification Steps
As the original developer, I have
Satisfied acceptance criteria and met development standards
Ensured code standards are met (Original Developer)
Validated user-facing changes (if applicable)
As a code reviewer, I have
Reviewed, tested, and left feedback about the changes
Validated user-facing changes as a developer
Note: Multiple code reviewers can share the checklists above, a second reviewer should not make a duplicate checklist. All checks should be checked before approving, even those labeled N/A.
As a designer reviewer, I have
Verified that the changes match the design intention
Validated user-facing changes as a designer
References
Screenshots