feat: /ceph redesign

[mtruj013]

Done

• Applied redesign as per doc and design
• Drive by:
  • Bump Vanilla version

QA

• View the site locally in your web browser at: https://ubuntu-com-14498.demos.haus/ceph
  • Be sure to test on mobile, tablet and desktop screen sizes
• Check against doc and design

Issue / Card

Fixes https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/WD-16343

[webteam-app]

Demo

Jenkins

demos.haus

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.76%. Comparing base (5a97dae) to head (3d11f2e).
Report is 49 commits behind head on feature-rebrand-ceph.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                   Coverage Diff                    @@
##           feature-rebrand-ceph   #14498      +/-   ##
========================================================
+ Coverage                 69.64%   69.76%   +0.12%     
========================================================
  Files                       120      120              
  Lines                      3419     3426       +7     
  Branches                   1178     1181       +3     
========================================================
+ Hits                       2381     2390       +9     
+ Misses                     1013     1012       -1     
+ Partials                     25       24       -1     

[mattea-turic]

thank you @mtruj013 !

• Could there be just one hr used here, as these two are essentially acting as an equal heights row

• I think I asked this before, but is it possible to have the ctas at the same level, like in the figma design – or is this a limitation of vanilla?

• On smaller screens, would it be possible to implement wrapping like this, for the items under "proven success with ceph storage" and "more choice, for your infrastructure"? Right now, they occupy too much space unless on desktop view

[mtruj013]

@mattea-turic ready for you!

or is this a limitation of vanilla?

Honestly, all of the spacing on this component is a limitation of vanilla because the component itself doesn't actually exist on vanilla 🙂 Should match now though

[mattea-turic]

ty @mtruj013 !

as discussed on mm, if you could drop the images in the section "Proven success with Ceph storage" for smaller screens – and that's all :)

I'll +1 given this change will be made