Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: Object oriented name update #5595

Merged
merged 36 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Samuelopez-ansys
Copy link
Member

@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys commented Dec 18, 2024

Description

Please provide a brief description of the changes made in this pull request.

Issue linked

Close #5568

Checklist

  • I have tested my changes locally.
  • I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
  • I have followed the coding style guidelines of this project.
  • I have added appropriate tests (unit, integration, system).
  • I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
  • I have linked the issue or issues that are solved by the PR if any.
  • I have agreed with the Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

Devin-Crawford and others added 12 commits December 14, 2024 08:11
When a mesh operation wasn't defined in desktop, invkoking the name property thew an error in AEDT.
Fix issue because GetChildObject() method does not behave consistently among AEDT solvers.
Fix issue because GetChildObject() method does not behave consistently among AEDT solvers.
Implemented code review suggestions.

Co-authored-by: Sébastien Morais <[email protected]>
Simplify syntax
…IX/Mesh-Operations-5568

# Conflicts:
#	src/ansys/aedt/core/application/design.py
@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 18, 2024
This was referenced Dec 18, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.81250% with 44 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.27%. Comparing base (d28b8d3) to head (923eb3e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5595      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.37%   85.27%   +3.89%     
==========================================
  Files         152      152              
  Lines       60904    60987      +83     
==========================================
+ Hits        49562    52004    +2442     
+ Misses      11342     8983    -2359     

# Conflicts:
#	src/ansys/aedt/core/modules/mesh.py
maxcapodi78
maxcapodi78 previously approved these changes Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@maxcapodi78 maxcapodi78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still a lot to do to fully embed ChildObjects into PyAEDT but this refatoring looks great

@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys added this to the v0.13.0 milestone Dec 19, 2024
@Samuelopez-ansys
Copy link
Member Author

Samuelopez-ansys commented Dec 19, 2024

All tests are passing, but before merging, I am checking if the examples are passing

@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys merged commit 1c9e725 into main Dec 20, 2024
41 of 43 checks passed
@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys deleted the fix/Mesh-Operations-5568 branch December 20, 2024 06:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug located in aedt/core/modules/mesh.py
4 participants