Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: Maxwell icepak example #5596

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

SMoraisAnsys
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Changes to fix maxwell icepak example.

@maxcapodi78 @Samuelopez-ansys Feel free to close this PR if you have something working. I need to drop now.

@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 18, 2024
@Samuelopez-ansys
Copy link
Member

@SMoraisAnsys I think this is duplicated with PR #5595

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.29%. Comparing base (c10d896) to head (60bb405).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5596   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.29%   85.29%           
=======================================
  Files         152      152           
  Lines       60906    60907    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        51948    51953    +5     
+ Misses       8958     8954    -4     

@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys merged commit fe63cde into main Dec 18, 2024
43 checks passed
@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys deleted the fix/maxwell-icepak-example branch December 18, 2024 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants