-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First draft for a meeting chair guide as inspired by Holger. #103
Open
mkurzman
wants to merge
3
commits into
Open-Source-Compliance:master
Choose a base branch
from
bosch-io:mkurzman_meeting_chair_guidance
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
# Guide for meeting chairs | ||
This guide is meant to help to keep the effort as low as possible for the meeting chair while keeping the documentation as accurate as possible at the same time. | ||
|
||
## Before the Meeting | ||
1. create a preparation branch "meeting_yyyymmdd" with yyyymmdd the date of the next meeting | ||
2. in the branch create a new file in a respective subfolder /Meeting-yyyymmdd/yyyymmdd.md | ||
3. you can use the following file [tbd] as template for the content of the new .md meeting log | ||
4. Check the mailing list for topics relevant for the meeting - potentially request topics by sending a mail to the list (may also serve as reminder) | ||
5. Prepare the standard content including the agenda | ||
6. Prepare a web-conference system (ideally BigBlueButton https://conf.fsfe.org/b/compliance-tooling see hints below) | ||
7. (optional) Check the OpenChain Global Calendar if the meeting details are correctly presented there and if necessary contact him for update | ||
8. Create a meeting invitation including the agenda and send it to the mailing list | ||
|
||
## While the Meeting | ||
1. Start the meeting in the respective meeting tool (ideally Big Blue Button) | ||
2. (optional) Ask / inform all participants for consent for recording and turn the cameras off. Start recording | ||
3. Show the [Antitrust slide from OpenChain](../Presentations/Antitrust_Policy_Notice.pptx) and inform about the Antitrust requirements (e.g. "Stick to the shared agenda", ...). | ||
4. Take notes in the yyyymmdd.md in the branch set up above in "2." | ||
5. Collect all participant names in the notes. | ||
6. commit the file | ||
|
||
## After the Meeting | ||
1. Ask presenters to provide their shown slides (as PDF - as external links are not reliable) | ||
2. (optional) store the slides in the folder /Meeting-yyyymmdd/ | ||
3. add the link to the slides in the yyyymmdd.md | ||
4. Finish the notes in yyyymmdd.md and create PR | ||
|
||
|
||
## Hints about BigBlueButton | ||
The BigBlueButton is provided to us by the FSFE. | ||
You can enter the room at any time, but for further features (sharing slides, recording,...) you need to have at least one room owner with special role that can either use the functionality or assign it to other participant (e.g. screen sharing) | ||
|
||
If this cannot be guaranteed please check for alternative conference systems (e.g. MS Teams or whatever you can use in your organization) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I made the first *.md-file I tried to copy structure from a good practice so I went to the SPDX-community: https://github.com/spdx/meetings/tree/main/general
They have this section but tbh I had the same question but didn't have the time yet to ask them nor did I have the time to check if our internal antitrust requirements would require that transparency (If we manage to come back to record the meetings, the whole meeting would be anyway transparent).
I tried it out in my sessions to list the names and with MS Teams it was rather easy to collect the names but it is additional effort to invest. So I appreciate that you brought up this point. Also the agenda-point of "approving" the minutes of the last meeting seems to me very formal, but on the other hand the SPDX-meeting documentation is really crystal clear :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mkurzman thank you for the explanation. I would not regard this as mandatory. Approving the minutes I would not introduce. We are an open group and persons who participated in meeting a might not be present in meeting a+1 who will be empowered to approve the minutes in this case. I think this is overhead with zero value, so lets skip it.