Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.][MIG] stock_change_qty_reason #1674

Closed
wants to merge 34 commits into from

Conversation

Urvisha-OSI
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

rousseldenis and others added 30 commits March 23, 2023 19:06
Currently translated at 96.2% (25 of 26 strings)

Translation: stock-logistics-warehouse-12.0/stock-logistics-warehouse-12.0-stock_change_qty_reason
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-warehouse-12-0/stock-logistics-warehouse-12-0-stock_change_qty_reason/fr/
Currently translated at 100.0% (26 of 26 strings)

Translation: stock-logistics-warehouse-12.0/stock-logistics-warehouse-12.0-stock_change_qty_reason
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-warehouse-12-0/stock-logistics-warehouse-12-0-stock_change_qty_reason/zh_CN/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: stock-logistics-warehouse-13.0/stock-logistics-warehouse-13.0-stock_change_qty_reason
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-warehouse-13-0/stock-logistics-warehouse-13-0-stock_change_qty_reason/
Currently translated at 100.0% (25 of 25 strings)

Translation: stock-logistics-warehouse-14.0/stock-logistics-warehouse-14.0-stock_change_qty_reason
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-warehouse-14-0/stock-logistics-warehouse-14-0-stock_change_qty_reason/it/
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot migration stock_change_qty_reason

Copy link
Contributor

@rousseldenis rousseldenis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional review. The reasons view form is weird for the active field:

image

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

@Urvisha-OSI

@paradoxxxzero
Copy link

Superseeded in #1854

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

@Urvisha-OSI We switched to #1854

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

switched to #1854

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.