Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][MIG] l10n_es_pos: Migration to 16.0 #2615

Merged
merged 54 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023

Conversation

danielduqma
Copy link
Contributor

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

Aquí ya debe de quedar definitivamente corregido este problema #2582 para no tener que hacer cambios complicados en una misma versión que hace que 2 tipos de instancias sean incompatibles.

@danielduqma danielduqma marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 07:14
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration l10n_es_pos

l10n_es_pos/models/pos_order.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@danielduqma danielduqma force-pushed the 16.0-mig-l10n_es_pos branch 2 times, most recently from 33a789b to e546f36 Compare March 16, 2023 20:17
@danielduqma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Se ha rebaseado el desarrollo y se han aplicado los cambios aprobados en #2812 para este módulo en la rama 14.0.

@chienandalu
Copy link
Member

Ten en cuenta también algunos cambios que ha habido que adaptar en el FW que se ha hecho en #2965

suker and others added 2 commits April 10, 2023 12:03
POS config names can be repeated, for example when running
`point_of_sale` tests. Hence, created sequences would be duplicated, so
with this change this is checked and prevented adding a suffix.
@danielduqma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ten en cuenta también algunos cambios que ha habido que adaptar en el FW que se ha hecho en #2965

Hecho! He aplicado los cambios del 15.0 en el histórico de la rama.

order.to_invoice = true;
}
}
super.validateOrder(isForceValidate);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
super.validateOrder(isForceValidate);
await super.validateOrder(isForceValidate);

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Corregido, gracias por la revisión!

Change made in 1baf50b avoids showing customer popup on orders above
limit (invoiced). Moving back logic to `validateOrder` fixes this
problem.
Copy link

@fcvalgar fcvalgar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Revisión funcional.

Perfecto el proceso de validación. Muy intuitivo y claro.

https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/video/17092554?key=6af6d010c88d816f27488b2f43775b96

Gracias @danielduqma.

@RodrigoBM
Copy link
Contributor

@oca/local-spain-maintainers ¿Alguien puede mergear el PR?

Copy link
Member

@rafaelbn rafaelbn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

¡Gran trabajo a todos!

@omar7r tu que eres experto de POS 😄 y PSC?

@chienandalu de acuerdo?

@pedrobaeza te animas?

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Necesito la confirmación de alguien de PoS.

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza yo lo he probado y soy PSC de PoS, ¿No te sirvo? 😄

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Es una review técnica de JavaScript, Rafa.

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

Aquí tienes la review funcional: https://www.loom.com/share/c9dc6f97080d4d0fb4f188b782370cee

He revisado tanto funcionamiento como secuencias y desglose correcto de impuestos, como operativa para complir con la normativa.

@zamberjo
Copy link
Member

zamberjo commented Jun 6, 2023

Hola, puedes incluir el FIX #3066 (15.0) (14.0 #3053)?

Copy link
Member

@chienandalu chienandalu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-2615-by-pedrobaeza-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 5928e95 into OCA:16.0 Jun 6, 2023
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at f25f6ca. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@RodrigoBM
Copy link
Contributor

Hola, puedes incluir el FIX #3066 (15.0) (14.0 #3053)?

No le ha dado a mi compañero a añadirlo antes del mergeo, ¿puedes crear un PR con el fix y lo revisamos?

@zamberjo
Copy link
Member

zamberjo commented Jun 6, 2023

Si, estoy en ello

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.