-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][MIG] l10n_es_pos: Migration to 16.0 #2615
Conversation
dfd97f0
to
b2fc63a
Compare
Aquí ya debe de quedar definitivamente corregido este problema #2582 para no tener que hacer cambios complicados en una misma versión que hace que 2 tipos de instancias sean incompatibles. |
b2fc63a
to
d238117
Compare
/ocabot migration l10n_es_pos |
33a789b
to
e546f36
Compare
31b725c
to
eb9fcf7
Compare
Se ha rebaseado el desarrollo y se han aplicado los cambios aprobados en #2812 para este módulo en la rama 14.0. |
Ten en cuenta también algunos cambios que ha habido que adaptar en el FW que se ha hecho en #2965 |
Currently translated at 100.0% (31 of 31 strings) Translation: l10n-spain-12.0/l10n-spain-12.0-l10n_es_pos Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/l10n-spain-12-0/l10n-spain-12-0-l10n_es_pos/es/
POS config names can be repeated, for example when running `point_of_sale` tests. Hence, created sequences would be duplicated, so with this change this is checked and prevented adding a suffix.
6a2e854
to
8b6615c
Compare
Hecho! He aplicado los cambios del 15.0 en el histórico de la rama. |
order.to_invoice = true; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
super.validateOrder(isForceValidate); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
super.validateOrder(isForceValidate); | |
await super.validateOrder(isForceValidate); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Corregido, gracias por la revisión!
Change made in 1baf50b avoids showing customer popup on orders above limit (invoiced). Moving back logic to `validateOrder` fixes this problem.
8b6615c
to
bb5ee01
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Revisión funcional.
Perfecto el proceso de validación. Muy intuitivo y claro.
https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/video/17092554?key=6af6d010c88d816f27488b2f43775b96
Gracias @danielduqma.
@oca/local-spain-maintainers ¿Alguien puede mergear el PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
¡Gran trabajo a todos!
@omar7r tu que eres experto de POS 😄 y PSC?
@chienandalu de acuerdo?
@pedrobaeza te animas?
Necesito la confirmación de alguien de PoS. |
@pedrobaeza yo lo he probado y soy PSC de PoS, ¿No te sirvo? 😄 |
Es una review técnica de JavaScript, Rafa. |
Aquí tienes la review funcional: https://www.loom.com/share/c9dc6f97080d4d0fb4f188b782370cee He revisado tanto funcionamiento como secuencias y desglose correcto de impuestos, como operativa para complir con la normativa. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
/ocabot merge nobump |
Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you. |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at f25f6ca. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Si, estoy en ello |
#2526