Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shellcheck check-cabal-files.sh #737

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

smelc
Copy link
Contributor

@smelc smelc commented Apr 24, 2024

Changelog

- description: |
    Shellcheck check-cabal-files.sh
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  # - improvement    # QoL changes e.g. refactoring
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  - test           # fixes/modifies tests
  # - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

Follow-up of #734, making check-cabal-files.sh shellcheck-compliant and actually checking it in the CI (by removing it from the list of exceptions).

How to trust this PR

Execute ./scripts/ci/check-cabal.files.sh before and after this change and witness it outputs the same.

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@smelc smelc force-pushed the smelc/shellcheck-check-cabal-files branch from 7dd2adf to 93d2e6e Compare April 24, 2024 15:14
@smelc smelc force-pushed the smelc/shellcheck-check-cabal-files branch from 93d2e6e to a13bae3 Compare April 26, 2024 08:01
@smelc smelc merged commit fb5f940 into main Apr 26, 2024
20 of 21 checks passed
@smelc smelc deleted the smelc/shellcheck-check-cabal-files branch April 26, 2024 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants