-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Warn user about implicit qubit permutations in tk_to_qiskit
#412
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e26848f
fix: warn user if Circuit contains IQP
CalMacCQ b916868
add test
CalMacCQ 22a875d
add changelog entry
CalMacCQ 94139f8
remove unused import
CalMacCQ 07c307e
organise imports for ruff
CalMacCQ b4a112d
fix a typo
CalMacCQ 58817c8
improve `_has_implicit_permutation` function
CalMacCQ af965ef
fix typo
CalMacCQ File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1172,3 +1172,10 @@ def test_nonregister_bits() -> None: | |
c.rename_units({Bit(0): Bit(1)}) | ||
with pytest.raises(NotImplementedError): | ||
tk_to_qiskit(c) | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_implicit_swap_warning() -> None: | ||
c = Circuit(2).H(0).SWAP(0, 1) | ||
c.replace_SWAPs() | ||
with pytest.warns(UserWarning, match="The pytket Circuit contains implicit qubit"): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Kindof suprised that python can use this I guess errors like |
||
tk_to_qiskit(c) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be better defined in pytket rather than this extension: there's nothing specific to qiskit about it. But for now there is no need to factor it out as a method, since it's only used in one place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. Maybe it should just be a property/method of
Circuit
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. But for the purpose of this PR the check can just be inlined.