Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: link reliability checks #3814

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

feat: link reliability checks #3814

merged 9 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

robertsLando
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@robertsLando
Copy link
Member Author

cc @AlCalzone

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 16, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9969867167

Details

  • 0 of 43 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 21.022%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
api/lib/SocketEvents.ts 0 1 0.0%
src/lib/SocketEvents.js 0 1 0.0%
api/lib/ZwaveClient.ts 0 41 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9957804827: -0.05%
Covered Lines: 3899
Relevant Lines: 19727

💛 - Coveralls

@AlCalzone AlCalzone changed the title feat: link statistics diagnostic feat: link reliability checks Jul 16, 2024
@AlCalzone
Copy link
Member

this is pending a node-zwave-js release

@AlCalzone
Copy link
Member

Needs either v12.13.0 (out in a few minutes) or 13.0.0-beta.7 (also out in a few minutes).

@robertsLando robertsLando marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2024 13:51
@robertsLando
Copy link
Member Author

Bumped

@AlCalzone

This comment was marked as resolved.

@robertsLando robertsLando merged commit f2fc6d6 into master Jul 17, 2024
9 checks passed
@robertsLando robertsLando deleted the link-statistics branch July 17, 2024 07:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants