Standardize response

[pem70]

What It Does
addresses [#266]

How to Test

Review Checklist
I certify that I have:

• tested my changes
• added/updated automated tests
• updated the changelog
• followed the contribution guidelines

Additional Comments

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.37%. Comparing base (8ac7348) to head (f02124b).
Report is 191 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/zos_jobs/zowe/zos_jobs_for_zowe_sdk/jobs.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #285      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.27%   89.37%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          53       53              
  Lines        2536     2542       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         2264     2272       +8     
+ Misses        272      270       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	89.37% <90.00%> (+0.10%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zFernand0]

As a test, I went ahead and changed the base of this PR, and it seemed to have cleaned up a lot of the commits 😋
Should we keep it with the TSO branch as the base, or would you prefer for this PR to be rebased back to main?

@pem70, @t1m0thyj, and @traeok, any thoughts?

[zFernand0]

Thanks for cleaning up the tests! 🥳
Left one small comment on this, but changes LGTM! 😋

[traeok]

...@traeok, any thoughts?

I think it makes sense to keep the base branch as TSO, if it makes it easier to get everything merged into main 😋

[traeok]

LGTM, thanks Peizhao!

Changes were addressed

[t1m0thyj]

LGTM, thanks @pem70!