Fnf error reporting

[ATorrise]

What It Does
Makes zosjob command errors more legible

How to Test

• In vscode debugger:

    {
        "type": "node",
        "request": "launch",
        "name": "FNF messaging",
        "program": "${workspaceFolder}/zowe-cli/packages/cli/lib/main.js",
        "console": "integratedTerminal",
        // "args": ["files", "upload", "dtp", "src", "ibmuser.src"],
        "args": ["jobs", "submit", "lf", "noexist"],
        // "args": ["files", "upload", "ftds", "local", "remote"],
        "outputCapture": "std",
        "resolveSourceMapLocations": null
    },

• compare output via command line:
  zowe jobs submit lf "noexist"
zowe files upload ftds local "remote"

Review Checklist
I certify that I have:

• tested my changes
• added/updated automated tests
• updated the changelog
• followed the contribution guidelines

Additional Comments

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 77.02703% with 17 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.93%. Comparing base (10c5389) to head (152262f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on next.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...es/cli/src/zosjobs/submit/Submit.shared.handler.ts	77.02%	17 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next    #2078      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.93%   90.93%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         616      616              
  Lines       17370    17377       +7     
  Branches     3674     3676       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        15796    15801       +5     
- Misses       1573     1575       +2     
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[t1m0thyj]

Looks pretty good, thanks @ATorrise! Left a few comments around how we could make the error details look more similar to output of files upload command.

[gejohnston]

Thanks for reworking this and reversing the behavior that was originally requested in the issue.

After Timothy's comments are addressed, I would approve the PR.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
80.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[t1m0thyj]

LGTM, thanks @ATorrise!

[zFernand0]

changes do make sense!
LGTM! 😋

[zFernand0]

a bit confused as to why this was added twice here 😋

[github-actions]

Release succeeded for the next branch. 🎉

The following packages have been published:

• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]
• npm: @zowe/[email protected]

_{Powered by Octorelease 🚀}