-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: CCTX tracking #170
fix: CCTX tracking #170
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes primarily refactor the logic and structure of the Changes
Possibly Related Issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ const fetchCCTXByInbound = async ( | |||
try { | |||
const url = `${API}/zeta-chain/crosschain/inTxHashToCctx/${hash}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is the url stil the same or should it change to inboundHashToCctx?
mainly because before it matched with the data key we have on line 37
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The URL is /zeta-chain/crosschain/inTxHashToCctx/{inboundHash}
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
packages/client/src/trackCCTX.ts (4)
Line range hint
96-99
:
Enhance error handling ingetCCTX
.Currently, the function silently catches errors. Consider logging the error or providing more context for debugging purposes.
try { const url = `${API}/zeta-chain/crosschain/cctx/${hash}`; const apiResponseData = await apiFetch(url); return apiResponseData?.CrossChainTx; } catch (e) { console.error(`Failed to fetch CCTX for hash ${hash}:`, e); return null; }
Line range hint
101-106
:
Enhance error handling infetchNonces
.Currently, the function silently catches errors. Consider logging the error or providing more context for debugging purposes.
try { const url = `${API}/zeta-chain/observer/pendingNonces`; const apiResponseData = await apiFetch(url); const nonces = apiResponseData?.pending_nonces; return nonces.filter((n: any) => n.tss === TSS); } catch (e) { console.error(`Failed to fetch pending nonces:`, e); return []; }
Line range hint
108-113
:
Enhance error handling infetchTSS
.Currently, the function silently catches errors. Consider logging the error or providing more context for debugging purposes.
try { const url = `${API}/zeta-chain/observer/TSS`; const apiResponseData = await apiFetch(url); return apiResponseData?.TSS.tss_pubkey; } catch (e) { console.error(`Failed to fetch TSS:`, e); return null; }
Line range hint
115-194
:
Consider refactoring for readability and maintainability.The
trackCCTX
function contains complex logic with nested conditions and asynchronous operations. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions to improve readability and maintainability.// Example: Consider extracting logic into helper functions async function handleCCTXTracking(hash, emitter, spinners, API, cctxs, json) { // Logic for handling CCTX tracking } async function processCCTXData(hash, emitter, spinners, API, cctxs, pendingNonces, json) { // Logic for processing CCTX data } // Usage in trackCCTX handleCCTXTracking(hash, emitter, spinners, API, cctxs, json); processCCTXData(hash, emitter, spinners, API, cctxs, pendingNonces, json);
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/client/src/trackCCTX.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/client/src/trackCCTX.ts (2)
37-37
: Verify the property nameinboundHashToCctx
.Ensure that the API response structure has been updated to use
inboundHashToCctx
. This change should be consistent with the API documentation.
61-69
: Verify the property names inoutbound_params
.Ensure that the API response structure has been updated to use
outbound_params
and other related property names. This change should be consistent with the API documentation.
This is a quick fix to make sure CCTX tracking works, but I'll need to refactor the code to use the latest API endpoints.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes