remove doc hidden from some keys

[AloeareV]

No description provided.

[AArnott]

I'm fully in favor of this. I know USK is not a spec'd format. And for that matter, IMO it's a terrible structure to reverse engineer. But it is nonetheless necessary to be able to cross the interop layer, and pretending that it isn't needed is silly.

[AArnott]

This should have been done as part of #1245 but it was overlooked.

[nuttycom]

The primary reason that these were #[doc(hidden)] is that in general USKs are intended to be opaque and not handled individually, and because the decision as to how to decide what components are included in the USK (currently, all for which feature flags are enabled) was not fully stabilized. That being said, for users of the API it's necessary to be able to derive the USK from the seed, so I agree with un-hiding the docs.

[nuttycom]

utACK

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.59%. Comparing base (e795174) to head (7cbfc1f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1296   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.59%   63.59%           
=======================================
  Files         121      121           
  Lines       13945    13945           
=======================================
  Hits         8869     8869           
  Misses       5076     5076           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.