-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Bug: Use int64 for topology's createdAt. (#16)
<!-- Thank you for submitting a pull request to our repository. --> ## Description Use int64 for topology's createdAt. <!-- Please provide a brief description of the changes in this pull request (max 80 chars). --> ## Changes Made <!-- Please list the changes that you made in this pull request. --> ## Related Issues <!-- Please list any related issues or pull requests. Fixes #{bug number} - use this specific format or issues won't be correctly linked to the PR --> ## Checklist <!-- Please check off the following items by putting an "x" in the box: --> - [ ] I have used a PR title that is descriptive enough for a release note. - [ ] I have tested these changes locally. - [ ] I have added appropriate tests or updated existing tests. - [ ] I have tested these changes on a dedicated VM or a customer VM [name of the VM] - [ ] I have added appropriate documentation or updated existing documentation. --------- Co-authored-by: Bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: tejo <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
1 parent
4dc00c8
commit c05ffdb
Showing
5 changed files
with
16 additions
and
35 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,31 +1,12 @@ | ||
# ProtoBuf Release Notes | ||
|
||
## 0.0.2-dev - 2023-11-09 | ||
|
||
### Documentation | ||
|
||
- Update documentation to reflect protocol buffer refactoring (PR #15 by | ||
@chicco785) | ||
|
||
## 0.0.1 - 2023-10-27 | ||
|
||
### Features | ||
|
||
- New protocol buffer for topology data (PR #12 by @chicco785) | ||
- Notification message: support Trigger requirements (PR #6 by @chicco785) | ||
- Add protocol buffer to describe faults (PR #3 by @chicco785) | ||
## 0.0.2-dev - 2023-11-13 | ||
|
||
### Bug Fixes | ||
|
||
- fix typo in `Fault` field `faultCurrent` (PR #7 by @tejo) | ||
|
||
### Continuous Integration | ||
- Bug: Use int64 for topology's createdAt. (PR #16 by @tejo) | ||
|
||
- Use new shared workflow for Golang (PR #11 by @chicco785) | ||
|
||
### Refactoring | ||
### Documentation | ||
|
||
- Refactor protobuffer to align with architecture discussion (PR #9 by | ||
- Update documentation to reflect protocol buffer refactoring (PR #15 by | ||
@chicco785) | ||
- Migrate existing protobuf from | ||
`https://github.com/zaphiro-technologies/rabbitmq-poc` (PR #2 by @chicco785) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
c05ffdb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold
1.50
.BenchmarkTopologySerialization
55653
ns/op32895
ns/op1.69
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.