-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace maxCreatedAtMap with version vector for causal-concurrent operations #932
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@chacha912 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (9)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications across several files to enhance the handling of versioning in operations. Key changes include the addition of a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/sdk/src/document/operation/tree_style_operation.ts (1)
79-79
: Consider makingattributesToRemove
an optional parameter with a default valueIn the
create
method,attributesToRemove
is being passed as an empty array[]
. To enhance code readability and simplify method calls, consider makingattributesToRemove
optional in the constructor and assigning a default value of an empty array. This way, you can avoid passing empty arrays explicitly when there are no attributes to remove.packages/sdk/src/document/operation/style_operation.ts (1)
79-83
: Consider removing unused parameterThe
_: OpSource
parameter is not used in the method implementation. Consider removing it if it's not required by the interface.public execute<A extends Indexable>( root: CRDTRoot, - _: OpSource, versionVector: VersionVector, ): ExecutionResult {
packages/sdk/src/document/operation/edit_operation.ts (1)
85-89
: Consider removing unused parameterThe
_: OpSource
parameter is not used in the method implementation. Consider removing it if it's not required by the interface.public execute<A extends Indexable>( root: CRDTRoot, - _: OpSource, versionVector: VersionVector, ): ExecutionResult {
packages/sdk/src/document/change/change.ts (2)
165-169
: Fix indentation in execute method callWhile the implementation is correct, the indentation appears inconsistent with the codebase style.
Apply this diff to fix the indentation:
- const executionResult = operation.execute( - root, - source, - this.id.getVersionVector(), - ); + const executionResult = operation.execute(root, source, this.id.getVersionVector());
165-169
: Consider documenting version vector implementation detailsThe shift from MaxCreatedAtMap to version vector is a significant architectural change. Consider:
- Adding documentation about version vector's role in causality tracking
- Documenting any performance implications
- Updating relevant API documentation
This will help maintainers understand the reasoning behind this architectural change and its implications.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
packages/sdk/src/document/change/change.ts
(1 hunks)packages/sdk/src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts
(9 hunks)packages/sdk/src/document/crdt/text.ts
(5 hunks)packages/sdk/src/document/crdt/tree.ts
(9 hunks)packages/sdk/src/document/operation/edit_operation.ts
(3 hunks)packages/sdk/src/document/operation/operation.ts
(2 hunks)packages/sdk/src/document/operation/style_operation.ts
(3 hunks)packages/sdk/src/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.ts
(4 hunks)packages/sdk/src/document/operation/tree_style_operation.ts
(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/sdk/src/document/crdt/text.ts (1)
Line range hint 952-963
: Duplicate potential null reference error with versionVector
in filterNodes
method
The same issue exists in the filterNodes
method. Please ensure that versionVector
is checked for undefined
before accessing its properties to prevent runtime errors.
packages/sdk/src/document/crdt/tree.ts (2)
1009-1023
: Duplicate potential null reference error with versionVector
in removeStyle
method
The same issue exists in the removeStyle
method. Please ensure that versionVector
is checked for undefined
before accessing its properties.
1117-1131
: Duplicate potential null reference error with versionVector
in edit
method
The same issue exists in the edit
method. Please ensure that versionVector
is checked for undefined
before accessing its properties.
packages/sdk/src/document/operation/style_operation.ts (1)
103-103
: LGTM: Version vector integration
The version vector is correctly propagated to the underlying setStyle
method, which aligns with the PR's objective of replacing maxCreatedAtMap with version vector for causal-concurrent operations.
packages/sdk/src/document/operation/edit_operation.ts (1)
111-111
: LGTM: Version vector integration
The version vector is correctly propagated to the underlying edit
method, which aligns with the PR's objective of replacing maxCreatedAtMap with version vector for causal-concurrent operations.
packages/sdk/src/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.ts (1)
133-133
: LGTM: Version vector integration
The version vector is correctly propagated to the underlying edit
method, which aligns with the PR's objective of replacing maxCreatedAtMap with version vector for causal-concurrent operations.
packages/sdk/src/document/operation/operation.ts (1)
19-19
: LGTM: Import statement correctly placed with time-related imports
The new import for VersionVector
is appropriately grouped with other time-related imports.
packages/sdk/src/document/change/change.ts (1)
165-169
: Verify version vector propagation in concurrent scenarios
The implementation correctly passes the version vector from the change ID to each operation. However, we should verify the behavior in concurrent editing scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see extensive testing of version vector propagation in concurrent scenarios, particularly in:
test/integration/tree_concurrency_test.ts
- Contains numerous test cases for concurrent operations including edit-edit, style-style, edit-style, and split operationstest/integration/text_test.ts
- Tests concurrent edit operations, insertions, deletionstest/integration/gc_test.ts
- Verifies version vector behavior during garbage collection in concurrent scenarios
The implementation is well-tested for concurrent editing scenarios, with proper version vector propagation verified through comprehensive test cases. The version vector is correctly used to track causality between operations from different clients.
Version vector propagation is properly implemented and tested for concurrent scenarios
- The version vector is correctly passed from change ID to operations
- Extensive test coverage exists for concurrent operations
- Version vector maintains proper causality tracking between concurrent changes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for test cases that verify concurrent operations
# with version vectors to ensure proper causality handling
# Search for test files containing concurrent operation scenarios
rg -l "concurrent|simultaneous|parallel" --type ts "test"
# Search for version vector usage in test files
rg "getVersionVector|versionVector" --type ts "test"
Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find test files in the repository
fd "\.test\.(ts|js)$"
# Then search for concurrent operations and version vectors in the entire codebase
rg -A 5 "concurrent|simultaneous|parallel" --type ts
rg -A 5 "getVersionVector|versionVector" --type ts
Length of output: 112008
36b4a38
to
0d714bd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution.
What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR replaces the usage of
MaxCreatedAtMapByActor
withversion vector
for operations that handle causal and concurrent relationships. (Text.Edit
,Text.Style
,Tree.Edit
, andTree.Style
)Any background context you want to provide?
What are the relevant tickets?
Related yorkie-team/yorkie#1088
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores