Merge pull request #31 from 0xAxe/patch-5

Update Implicit Conversions.md

content/2. Solidity 101/Implicit Conversions.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ An implicit type conversion is automatically applied by the compiler in some cas
 
 1. implicit conversion between value-types is possible if it makes sense semantically and no information is lost
 
-2. For example, `uint8` is convertible to uint16 and `int128` to `int256`, but `int8` is not convertible to `uint256`, because `uint256` cannot hold values such as `-1`
+2. For example, `uint8` is convertible to `uint16` and `int128` to `int256`, but `int8` is not convertible to `uint256`, because `uint256` cannot hold values such as `-1`
 ___
 ## Slide Screenshot
 ![068.jpg](../../images/2.%20Solidity%20101/068.jpg)
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ ___
 - Assignments/Arguments/Operators
 - Semantic Sense
 - No Information Lost
-- E.g.: `uint8` -> `uint16`, `int128` -> `inte256`, `int128 X` -> `uint256`, `uint256 X` -> `uint128`
+- E.g.: `uint8` -> `uint16`, `int128` -> `int256`, `int128 X` -> `uint256`, `uint256 X` -> `uint128`
 ___
 ## References
 - [Youtube Reference](https://youtu.be/WgU7KKKomMk?t=653)