-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add events to receipt object #6410
Add events to receipt object #6410
Conversation
…-are-not-of-an-event-object
Bundle StatsHey there, this message comes from a github action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger No assets were bigger Smaller No assets were smaller Unchanged
|
Deploying with Cloudflare Pages
|
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.x #6410 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.15% 89.88% +0.72%
==========================================
Files 199 201 +2
Lines 7756 7779 +23
Branches 2147 2129 -18
==========================================
+ Hits 6915 6992 +77
+ Misses 841 787 -54
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
…-are-not-of-an-event-object
Looks like codecov is failing |
…-are-not-of-an-event-object
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pls there should be e2e tests for tx having receipt.events present for contract.send, and also not present ( for simple tx ) with geth.
other than junaids comment, lgtm 👍 |
…-are-not-of-an-event-object
done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @avkos , this seems good.
However, still args
are not filled. According to the raised issue: #6312
(The returned log does not include the properties: event and args)
I am not sure about the exact properties of those args. It needs to be checked against 1.x. But they seem to be used to access at least args.eventID, args._from, args.num (See here https://github.com/nazarhussain/truffle/blob/656263aadf21612b17829483d7376eb7afbe63aa/packages/artifactor/test/contracts.js#L242 and https://github.com/nazarhussain/truffle/blob/656263aadf21612b17829483d7376eb7afbe63aa/packages/deployer/test/await.js#L134-L135)
Or what do you think?
here is a [email protected] response it doesn't have any args field. Looks like. truffle added it inside the library |
just for your information here is [email protected] response we have logs and events fields |
Description
Please include a summary of the changes and be sure to follow our Contribution Guidelines.
Fixes #6312
Type of change
Checklist:
npm run lint
with success and extended the tests and types if necessary.npm run test:unit
with success.npm run test:coverage
and my test cases cover all the lines and branches of the added code.npm run build
and testeddist/web3.min.js
in a browser.CHANGELOG.md
file in the root folder.