fix: post description image for block theme #1490
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files to enhance the functionality and robustness of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Content.php (2)
14-19: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The changes look good and address compatibility with block themes. The use of
function_exists()ensures backward compatibility.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why this check and filter are necessary for block themes. This would improve code maintainability. For example:
// Add content formatting filter for block themes to ensure proper rendering if ( function_exists( 'wp_is_block_theme' ) && wp_is_block_theme() ) { add_filter( 'format_for_editor', [ $this, 'format_for_editor' ], 10, 2 ); }
21-34: LGTM! Consider adding type hinting and error handling.The new
format_for_editormethod looks good and addresses the specific formatting needs for the TinyMCE editor.Consider adding type hinting and a null check for improved robustness:
public function format_for_editor( ?string $content, string $default_editor ): string { if ( 'tinymce' !== $default_editor ) { return $content ?? ''; } return htmlspecialchars_decode( $content ?? '', ENT_NOQUOTES ); }This change ensures that the method always returns a string, even if
$contentis null, which could happen in some edge cases.includes/Frontend_Render_Form.php (1)
225-227: LGTM: Improved type safety and formattingThe changes in this segment enhance code quality:
- Using
===for strict comparison improves type safety.- The adjusted indentation of the script tag improves code readability.
These modifications align well with coding best practices.
Consider using template literals for better readability when concatenating strings in the class attribute:
- <form class="wpuf-form-add wpuf-form-<?php echo esc_attr( $layout ); ?> <?php echo ( 'layout1' === $layout ) ? esc_html( $theme_css ) : 'wpuf-style'; ?>" action="" method="post"> + <form class="wpuf-form-add wpuf-form-<?php echo esc_attr( $layout ); ?> <?php echo ( 'layout1' === $layout ) ? esc_html( $theme_css ) : 'wpuf-style'; ?>" action="" method="post">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Content.php (1 hunks)
- includes/Frontend/Frontend_Form.php (2 hunks)
- includes/Frontend_Render_Form.php (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Content.php (1)
Line range hint
1-34: Summary: Changes improve block theme compatibility and content formatting.The modifications to the
Form_Field_Post_Contentclass effectively address compatibility with block themes and enhance content formatting for the TinyMCE editor. These changes align well with the PR objectives and should improve the overall functionality of the post content field.To further improve the code:
- Consider adding explanatory comments for the block theme check in the constructor.
- Implement type hinting and null checks in the
format_for_editormethod for increased robustness.These minor enhancements will contribute to better code maintainability and reliability.
includes/Frontend_Render_Form.php (2)
186-189: LGTM: Improved type safety and securityThe changes in this segment enhance both type safety and security:
- Using
!==for strict comparison improves type safety.- Wrapping the error message with
wp_kses_post()ensures proper sanitization of the output.These modifications align well with WordPress coding standards and security best practices.
Line range hint
1-465: Overall assessment: Improvements in code quality and securityThe changes in this file contribute to the overall objectives of the PR by enhancing type safety, security, and code readability. The modifications are in line with WordPress coding standards and best practices. No major issues were identified, and the changes should positively impact the functionality of the form rendering process, especially in the context of block themes.
includes/Frontend/Frontend_Form.php (1)
55-56: Approved: Early return for non-logged-in users.Adding a return statement after handling non-logged-in users ensures that the function exits gracefully, preventing unauthorized access to subsequent code.
| * @return false|string | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding a return type declaration to the method.
The docblock specifies @return false|string, but the method signature does not include the return type declaration. Adding the return type enhances type safety and keeps the code consistent with modern PHP practices.
Apply this diff to include the return type declaration:
public function edit_post_shortcode( $atts )
+ : false|string {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| $nonce = isset( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ? sanitize_key( wp_unslash( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ) : ''; | ||
|
|
||
| if ( ! wp_verify_nonce( $nonce, 'wpuf_edit' ) ) { | ||
| return '<div class="wpuf-info">' . __( 'Please re-open the post', 'wp-user-frontend' ) . '</div>'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use sanitize_text_field for proper nonce sanitization.
Using sanitize_key may alter the nonce value and cause verification to fail. To preserve the integrity of the nonce, consider using sanitize_text_field instead.
Apply this diff to fix the sanitization:
$nonce = isset( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ?
- sanitize_key( wp_unslash( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ) : '';
+ sanitize_text_field( wp_unslash( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ) : '';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| $nonce = isset( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ? sanitize_key( wp_unslash( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ) : ''; | |
| if ( ! wp_verify_nonce( $nonce, 'wpuf_edit' ) ) { | |
| return '<div class="wpuf-info">' . __( 'Please re-open the post', 'wp-user-frontend' ) . '</div>'; | |
| $nonce = isset( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ? sanitize_text_field( wp_unslash( $_GET['_wpnonce'] ) ) : ''; | |
| if ( ! wp_verify_nonce( $nonce, 'wpuf_edit' ) ) { | |
| return '<div class="wpuf-info">' . __( 'Please re-open the post', 'wp-user-frontend' ) . '</div>'; |
Rubaiyat-E-Mohammad
added
QA In Progress
QA Approved
fixes #524
Testing-flow:
Post Description-image enabledActual Result: Image added in Post Description field is distorted
Expected Result: Image should display as it was uploaded when submitting form
Screenshot for reference:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor