Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: translation for password strength #1476

Merged

Conversation

sapayth
Copy link
Member

@sapayth sapayth commented Sep 5, 2024

fixes #571

Issue:
The password strength error message on the registration form is not translated using Loco Translate.

image

related PR #625

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced password strength validation messages with localized strings for "weak," "medium," and "strong" requirements.
    • Improved user guidance through clearer error messages related to password strength.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted localization strings to ensure accurate translations and user feedback.
  • Documentation

    • Added comments for clarity on existing strings related to shortcode restrictions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to error message strings related to password strength validation, the introduction of new private properties in a class for managing taxonomy exclusions, the addition of translation strings for user feedback on password requirements, and updates to localization files for improved clarity and structure. Additionally, there is a request to alter the dashboard greeting to use the display name instead of the username.

Changes

Files Change Summary
assets/js/frontend-form.js, includes/Frontend.php Updated password strength validation messages to use localized strings. Added new translation strings for password strength.
includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php Introduced new private properties $exclude_type and $exclude in the Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy class.
languages/wp-user-frontend.pot Updated localization strings, including new entries for password strength validation messages.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Use Display Name or NickName in Dashboard (#[571]) The changes do not address the dashboard greeting modification.

🐇 In the meadow, I hop with glee,
New messages for all to see!
Passwords strong, and names so bright,
A dashboard greeting, what a delight!
With every change, we leap and bound,
In our code, joy and clarity found! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
includes/Frontend.php (1)

Line range hint 156-164: Potential issue with undefined variable $wp.

The method dokan_is_seller_dashboard uses $wp->query_vars['posts'] to determine the dashboard context. However, $wp is not defined within this method, which could lead to an undefined variable error.

Suggestion:
Ensure that $wp is either passed to the method or globally declared within it to avoid potential issues.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 49a2c9f and c76a0df.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • assets/js/frontend-form.min.js is excluded by !**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (4)
  • assets/js/frontend-form.js (1 hunks)
  • includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php (1 hunks)
  • includes/Frontend.php (1 hunks)
  • languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (8 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
includes/Frontend.php (2)

138-142: Translation strings for password strength are well implemented.

The new translation strings for indicating password strength requirements ("weak," "medium," and "strong") are correctly added and localized. This should effectively address the issue with password strength translation mentioned in the PR.

Suggestion:
Consider adding more context or examples in the translation strings to help users understand what constitutes weak, medium, or strong passwords. This could enhance user understanding and compliance.


Line range hint 166-182: Admin bar visibility control is correctly implemented.

The method show_admin_bar effectively manages the visibility of the admin bar based on user roles, adhering to the settings specified in the plugin's options. This implementation is secure and follows best practices for role-based visibility in WordPress.

includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php (2)

26-28: Property Declaration Approved: $exclude_type

The property $exclude_type is well-documented and correctly declared with an appropriate type annotation.


31-33: Property Declaration Approved: $exclude

The property $exclude is correctly declared with a mixed type annotation, providing flexibility for handling various exclusion scenarios.

assets/js/frontend-form.js (1)

682-694: Refactor password strength validation messages for localization.

The changes made to the password strength validation messages are crucial for supporting multiple languages, which enhances the user experience for non-English speakers. The use of wpuf_frontend object properties like password_warning_weak, password_warning_medium, and password_warning_strong ensures that these messages can be easily translated using the Loco Translate plugin or similar tools.

This approach adheres to best practices for internationalization in web applications, making the messages accessible to a broader audience. The implementation is consistent with the PR's objective to fix translation issues.

languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (3)

7-7: Updated POT-Creation-Date

The POT-Creation-Date has been updated to reflect the most recent changes. This is standard practice when modifying a .pot file to ensure that translators know the file has been updated.


4971-4982: Updated password strength validation messages

The password strength validation messages have been updated to ensure they are translatable. This change is crucial for non-English speaking users to understand the password requirements clearly. It's important to verify that these strings are used consistently across the platform where password validation occurs.


1459-1460: Updated references for taxonomy fields

The references for taxonomy fields in Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php have been updated. This change likely corresponds to modifications in the source code where these fields are defined or used. It's important to ensure that these changes are accurately reflected in the actual source files to maintain consistency.

Also applies to: 1465-1465

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Updated references for taxonomy fields are accurate

The references for taxonomy fields in Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php at lines 144 and 274 are correctly pointing to sections of the code where taxonomy fields are configured. The changes in the .pot file are consistent with the source code. No further action is needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the changes in taxonomy field references are reflected in the source files.

# Test: Search for the updated line numbers in Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php.
rg --type python -A 5 $'Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php'

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the changes in taxonomy field references are reflected in the source files.

# Test: Search for the specific line numbers in Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php.
rg --type php -n -A 5 'Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php' | grep -E '144|274'

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the existence of Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php and verify line numbers.

# Search for the Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php file in the repository.
fd --type f --name 'Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php'

# If the file exists, display its contents around the specified lines.
if fd --type f --name 'Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php' > /dev/null; then
  rg --type php -n -A 5 -B 5 'Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php' | grep -E '144|274'
fi

Length of output: 601


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the existence of Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php and verify line numbers.

# Search for the Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php file in the repository.
fd 'Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php'

# If the file exists, display its contents around the specified lines.
if fd 'Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php' > /dev/null; then
  rg --type php -n -A 5 -B 5 'Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php' | grep -E '144|274'
fi

Length of output: 190


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Output contents of Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php around specific lines to verify changes.

# Display contents around line 144
echo "Contents around line 144:"
sed -n '139,149p' includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php

# Display contents around line 274
echo "Contents around line 274:"
sed -n '269,279p' includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php

Length of output: 1511

* @var mixed
*/
private $exclude;

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor Suggestion: Simplify render Method

The render method is quite complex and handles multiple scenarios. Consider refactoring it to improve readability and maintainability. Possible approaches could include breaking it down into smaller, more focused methods or using a strategy pattern for different field types.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c76a0df and 745bc9f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • includes/Frontend.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • includes/Frontend.php

@Rubaiyat-E-Mohammad Rubaiyat-E-Mohammad added QA In Progress QA Approved This PR is approved by the QA team Ready to Merge This PR is now ready to be merged and removed needs: testing QA In Progress labels Sep 5, 2024
@sapayth sapayth merged commit f109638 into weDevsOfficial:develop Sep 6, 2024
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
QA Approved This PR is approved by the QA team Ready to Merge This PR is now ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants