Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify GPC not intended as endorsement of tracking or opt-out regulatory models #87

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

j-br0
Copy link
Contributor

@j-br0 j-br0 commented Dec 4, 2024

Designed to address #82 and concerns expressed at TPAC that W3C standardization of the Global Privacy Control could be interpreted as an endorsement of tracking by default or of opt-out based laws. The revised text notes that opt-out based approaches are just one possible regulatory model, and GPC should not be interpreted as an endorsement of them but as a tool to make those laws workable where they exist.

j-br0 added 2 commits December 3, 2024 22:28
Revised intro to explain that GPC was designed to make opt-out laws more practically workable. It is not an implicit endorsement of those models or tracking more broadly.
Clarify that GPC is universal signal broadcast to all website publishers (in vast majority of instances).
@rinchen
Copy link
Member

rinchen commented Dec 5, 2024

The changes look good to me.

index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
j-br0 and others added 2 commits January 8, 2025 18:30
Minor wording change suggested by Martin Thomson.

Co-authored-by: Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
Minor wording change from Martin Thomson.

Co-authored-by: Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
@j-br0 j-br0 merged commit 9176c65 into main Jan 9, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants