Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(backups): convert cleanvm to typescript #8256

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stephane-m-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@stephane-m-dev stephane-m-dev commented Jan 16, 2025

Description

WIP

This is the _cleanVm.mjs built from the .mts.
This allows to see with the diff that the resulting mjs file is the same, except for the empty lines that were deleted by TSC. (not configurable)

I only executed prettier --write *.mjs to remove the ";" at end of lines. (not configurable too)

Dependencies are only partially typed at the moment.

Checklist

  • Commit
    • Title follows commit conventions
    • Reference the relevant issue (Fixes #007, See xoa-support#42, See https://...)
    • If bug fix, add Introduced by
  • Changelog
    • If visible by XOA users, add changelog entry
    • Update "Packages to release" in CHANGELOG.unreleased.md
  • PR
    • If UI changes, add screenshots
    • If not finished or not tested, open as Draft

Review process

This 2-passes review process aims to:

  • develop skills of junior reviewers
  • limit the workload for senior reviewers
  • limit the number of unnecessary changes by the author
  1. The author creates a PR.
  2. Review process:
    1. The author assigns the junior reviewer.
    2. The junior reviewer conducts their review:
      • Resolves their comments if they are addressed.
      • Adds comments if necessary or approves the PR.
    3. The junior reviewer assigns the senior reviewer.
    4. The senior reviewer conducts their review:
      • If there are no unresolved comments on the PR → merge.
      • Otherwise, we continue with 3.
  3. The author responds to comments and/or makes corrections, and we go back to 2.

Notes:

  1. The author can request a review at any time, even if the PR is still a Draft.
  2. In theory, there should not be more than one reviewer at a time.
  3. The author should not make any changes:
    • When a reviewer is assigned.
    • Between the junior and senior reviews.

@stephane-m-dev stephane-m-dev self-assigned this Jan 16, 2025
@stephane-m-dev stephane-m-dev changed the title Backups cleanvm convert to ts chore(backups): convert cleanvm to typescript Jan 16, 2025
@stephane-m-dev stephane-m-dev requested review from fbeauchamp and removed request for fbeauchamp January 17, 2025 16:07
Copy link
Collaborator

@fbeauchamp fbeauchamp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am still not convinced thah the ts compilation should be considered as necessary, but if yes, I would advise to have a /dist/ folder that contains all the build artefacts

also I think that it would be better to either really type a file ( no any ) or use jsdoc to clarify the modules status. And typing RemoteAdapter is out of reach for now

Comment on lines +519 to +522
for (const vdi of Object.values(metadata.vdis ?? {})) {
const uuid = vdi.uuid
console.log({ uuid })
metadata.isVhdDifferencing[`${uuid}.vhd`] = false
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not related on this PR

Comment on lines +505 to +513
console.log({
/* metadata, */ vdis: metadata.vdis,
isVhdDifferencing: metadata.isVhdDifferencing,
parent: metadata.vmSnapshot.parent,
mergedSize,
fixMetadata,
fileSystemSize,
size,
})
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

console shouldn't be in review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants