Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: README env table formatting #271

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

fix: README env table formatting #271

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

KahanMajmudar
Copy link
Collaborator

@KahanMajmudar KahanMajmudar commented Nov 22, 2024

Proposed changes

Fixes the env table formatting in readme

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? (A breaking change is a fix or feature that would cause existing functionality and APIs to not work as expected.)
Put an x in the box that applies

  • Non-breaking fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking fix (breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Non-breaking feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking feature (breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change which changes implementation)
  • Messy (mixture of the above - requires explanation!)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I am making a pull request against the main branch (left side). Also you should start your branch off our main.
  • Lint and unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Ardian <[email protected]>
@0xArdi 0xArdi merged commit e117b91 into main Nov 25, 2024
7 checks passed
@0xArdi 0xArdi deleted the fix/readme branch November 25, 2024 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants