fix(billing): update pr title to glossary
#2686
Conversation
p6l-richard
requested review from
perkinsjr,
chronark,
mcstepp and
MichaelUnkey
as code owners
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
@p6l-richard is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@p6l-richard has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/billing/src/trigger/glossary/create-pr.ts (2)
Line range hint
165-169: Fix inconsistency between PR title and body textWhile the PR title has been updated to reference "Glossary", the PR body still refers to "API documentation". This creates an inconsistency in terminology.
Apply this diff to maintain consistent terminology:
title: `Add ${input} to Glossary`, head: branch, base: "main", - body: `This PR adds the ${input}.mdx file to the API documentation.`, + body: `This PR adds the ${input}.mdx file to the Glossary.`,
Line range hint
1-194: Overall implementation looks solid with room for architectural improvementsThe implementation is robust with proper error handling, logging, and consistent input sanitization. However, the function handles multiple responsibilities which could be separated for better maintainability.
Consider splitting the functionality into smaller, focused services:
GlossaryEntryService- Handle MDX file preparation and contentGitHubService- Manage branch operations and PR creationDatabaseService- Handle entry updatesThis would improve testability and make the code more maintainable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/billing/src/trigger/glossary/create-pr.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/billing/src/trigger/glossary/create-pr.ts (1)
165-165: Verify consistent terminology usage across the codebase
Let's ensure the terminology change from "API documentation" to "Glossary" is consistent across related files.
✅ Verification successful
Terminology is consistently used across the codebase
The search results show that:
- The term "Glossary" is used consistently across the codebase, particularly in file paths, component names, and UI text
- References to "API documentation" are appropriately used in context, mainly in prompt templates where it refers to the expertise domain rather than the product feature name
- The PR title "Add ${input} to Glossary" aligns with the established naming convention in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to "API documentation" that might need updating
rg -i "api.?documentation" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for inconsistent usage of "Glossary" vs "glossary"
rg -i "glossary" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to "API documentation" that might need updating
rg -i "api.?documentation"
# Search for inconsistent usage of "Glossary" vs "glossary"
rg -i "glossary"
Length of output: 11449
What does this PR do?
Fixes
Type of change
How should this be tested?
generate_glossary_entrytask inside trigger's prodChecklist
Required
pnpm buildpnpm fmtconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated