feat: lazy quantifier helper input #281
Draft
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update
add lazy quantifier version of original input helpers:
times.anyLazy
,times.atLeastLazy
,times.atMostLazy
andtimes.betweenLazy
undertimes
chain helper.maybeLazy
andoneOrMoreLazy
, two creating helpers.Request for Input and Discussion
Lazy quantifier functionality is easy to implement, but the current naming for new helpers might not be the best naming option.
Currently, I've thought of 3 naming pattern for lazy quantifier:
Lazy
to the name of originalgreedy
version helpers (current implementation), eg:times.anyLazy()
.Lazy
to the name of originalgreedy
version helpers, eg:times.LazyAny()
.(after some thought, I prefer this option more)
option
argument to the input, eg:times.any({ greedy : false })
andmaybe(<str>,{ greedy : false })
need some input before finalizing the naming and adding documentation.
Usage
Resolve
resolve #228