Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8 emoji for 17 #963

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 16, 2024
Merged

8 emoji for 17 #963

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 16, 2024

Conversation

eggrobin
Copy link
Member

@eggrobin eggrobin commented Nov 13, 2024

From ESC.

[181-C5] Consensus: Accept 8 new emoji characters with the following code points and character names, based on Section 2 of document L2/24-226R, for Unicode Version 17.0:

    U+1FAEA DISTORTED FACE
    U+1FAEF FIGHT CLOUD
    U+1FADD APPLE CORE
    U+1FACD ORCA
    U+1FAC8 HAIRY CREATURE
    U+1FA8A TROMBONE
    U+1F6D8 LANDSLIDE
    U+1FA8E TREASURE CHEST

nedley
nedley previously approved these changes Nov 13, 2024
markusicu
markusicu previously approved these changes Nov 16, 2024
@@ -2624,6 +2624,7 @@ FFFD ; A # So REPLACEMENT CHARACTER
1F6D0..1F6D2 ; W # So [3] PLACE OF WORSHIP..SHOPPING TROLLEY
1F6D3..1F6D4 ; N # So [2] STUPA..PAGODA
1F6D5..1F6D7 ; W # So [3] HINDU TEMPLE..ELEVATOR
1F6D8 ; N # So LANDSLIDE
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we know why some of these are W vs. N?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting... especially weird that the "User interface symbols" from Unicode 6 are inconsistent with each other.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At the risk of summoning an historian to find out why, U+231A and U+231B were changed from eaw=N to eaw=W in Unicode 9.0.

@eggrobin eggrobin merged commit 57a3085 into unicode-org:main Nov 16, 2024
16 checks passed
@nedley
Copy link
Contributor

nedley commented Nov 18, 2024

Should we have an invariant checking East_Asian_Width and Vertical_Orientation for Emoji_Presentation characters, at least for assignments from now on?

@markusicu
Copy link
Member

Should we have an invariant checking East_Asian_Width and Vertical_Orientation for Emoji_Presentation characters, at least for assignments from now on?

Is there a good correlation? Or is it more like "recently added emoji have been assigned eaw=W"?
If there is a good correlation, I suggest you create a PAG issue and propose certain property values going forward.
And maybe look for old emoji that use different values for seemingly no good reason.

@nedley
Copy link
Contributor

nedley commented Nov 18, 2024

Filed https://github.com/unicode-org/properties/issues/347 to get the ball rolling. Thanks!

@eggrobin
Copy link
Member Author

I think we forgot a property for these characters, namely the Emoji property 🙃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants