Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLDR-17288 vagrant/ansible: fix for openliberty / mysql #3420

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

srl295
Copy link
Member

@srl295 srl295 commented Dec 16, 2023

CLDR-17288

  • this is just to get the build going again, CLDR-17279 will be for fixing docs etc.
  • had to update the Ubuntu version (which we need in CLDR-16735) because of build issues, but should be forward/backward compatible.
  • This PR completes the ticket.

Discussion: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/73013

ALLOW_MANY_COMMITS=true

@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • tools/scripts/ansible/setup-playbook.yml is no longer changed in the branch

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • tools/scripts/ansible/Vagrantfile is now changed in the branch

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@srl295 srl295 self-assigned this Dec 18, 2023
@srl295 srl295 requested a review from btangmu December 18, 2023 23:03
@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Hooray! The files in the branch are the same across the force-push. 😃

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Hooray! The files in the branch are the same across the force-push. 😃

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@srl295 srl295 changed the title CLDR-17288 vagrant/ansible: fix for openliberty / mysql CLDR-17279 vagrant/ansible: fix for openliberty / mysql Dec 20, 2023
@srl295 srl295 changed the title CLDR-17279 vagrant/ansible: fix for openliberty / mysql CLDR-17288 vagrant/ansible: fix for openliberty / mysql Dec 20, 2023
@srl295 srl295 marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2023 22:08
@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Hooray! The files in the branch are the same across the force-push. 😃

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • .github/workflows/ansible-lint.yml is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • .github/workflows/ansible-lint.yml is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • tools/scripts/ansible/Vagrantfile is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

btangmu
btangmu previously approved these changes Dec 23, 2023
- relates some to CLDR-16735
@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • tools/scripts/ansible/cldr-apps-playbook.yml is now changed in the branch
  • tools/scripts/ansible/Vagrantfile is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@srl295 srl295 requested a review from btangmu December 26, 2023 20:00
@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • .github/workflows/ansible-lint.yml is different
  • tools/scripts/ansible/vagrant-playbook.yml is now changed in the branch
  • tools/scripts/ansible/Vagrantfile is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@srl295
Copy link
Member Author

srl295 commented Dec 26, 2023

@btangmu I'm wondering if a better way to go about this would be to actually provision and setup an azure machine as part of the testing. then we could run tests against it, and then shut it down. This could let us even spin up a new machine on request for testing. I'll try using docker, though.

@srl295 srl295 closed this Dec 26, 2023
@srl295 srl295 reopened this Dec 26, 2023
@btangmu
Copy link
Member

btangmu commented Dec 27, 2023

"actually provision and setup an azure machine as part of the testing" -- do you mean to integrate github with azure?

@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • .github/workflows/ansible-lint.yml is different
  • tools/scripts/ansible/vagrant-playbook.yml is no longer changed in the branch
  • tools/scripts/ansible/Vagrantfile is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

@srl295
Copy link
Member Author

srl295 commented Jan 5, 2024

@btangmu 'testprovision' now succeeds and prints:

ERROR this usually fails but we are ignoring the failure. Try it manually

Please review and then we can manually try vagrant up locally.

- Ref: CLDR-17297 for future enablement
@jira-pull-request-webhook
Copy link

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

  • .github/workflows/ansible-lint.yml is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

srl295 added 2 commits January 5, 2024 17:22
- this affects new ST setups only. Would fail the first time only, each time.
- finally document how to deploy locally, no tomcat anymore!
- This encompasses CLDR-17279
Copy link
Member

@btangmu btangmu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM except ourConn.commit() removal -- some callers use getDBConnection not getAConnection

- XPathTable should be called with an autoclose connection only
@srl295 srl295 requested a review from btangmu January 9, 2024 02:05
@srl295 srl295 merged commit a292ca8 into unicode-org:main Jan 9, 2024
12 checks passed
@srl295 srl295 deleted the waslib branch January 9, 2024 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants