CLDR-16638 remove mention of "reformed" in spec #3305
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… restore as a alias in Swedish
pedberg-icu
changed the title
markusicu
requested changes
Oct 3, 2023
pedberg-icu
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CLDR-16638
However we should consider formally deprecating "reformed" as a collation type, I filed https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/CLDR-17143 for that (and then we can get the Unicode FAQ updated, etc.). With this PR I have removed mention of it in the LDML spec. Note (as Markus pointed out) that clients who explicitly request the now-absent "reformed" collation type in Swedish will fall back to getting the "standard" behavior, which is the desired result ("standard" has the data that used to be "reformed").
ALLOW_MANY_COMMITS=true