December report #35
Merged
December report #35
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
17 tasks
|
@manics @Davsarper bar the links I think this is ready for review! |
Davsarper
requested changes
Jan 22, 2024
|
|
||
| ### Next steps | ||
|
|
||
| - Advocate for UK-TRE (or equivilant) should be lobbying 'up' to get standardised investment with an aim at reducing costs across the sector (not spliting funding across numerous initatives) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| - Advocate for UK-TRE (or equivilant) should be lobbying 'up' to get standardised investment with an aim at reducing costs across the sector (not spliting funding across numerous initatives) | |
| - Advocate for UK-TRE (or equivalent) should be lobbying 'up' to get standardised investment with an aim at reducing costs across the sector (not spliting funding across numerous initatives) |
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-local-cloud-hosting.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-multi-tre.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-nhs-sde.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| - some curate + have technical environment for analysis | ||
| - NHS Research SDE Network - HDRI Gateway | ||
| - Challenges in federation, working across multiple TRE | ||
| - Direction of travel is that health data will exist in SDEs - policy will default to SDEs, but it ma |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what do we do with incomplete sentences in raw notes? copy paste as is and show why it is important to take good notes or...?
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/workshop-satre.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/workshop-satre.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| - SATRE Fundamental to day job of defining a federated architecture of TRE | ||
| - Pulled together driver projects to form architecture, SATRE forms part of that ongoing picture | ||
| - Third avenue is feeding into emerging working group at Research Data Alliance. See [Recent Plenary BoF session](https://www.rd-alliance.org/trusted-research-environments-sensitive-data-fairness-closed-data-and-processes) and [draft WG charter](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1877OtQyZ46QCHVZ8_1QqRgZJPXyImZdW1qYVyKItMSQ/edit). | ||
| - Great that SATRE invovled public, reflect this in the specification would be good for funding, and to highlight directly in the specifications where the project has reflected public/patient requests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| - Great that SATRE invovled public, reflect this in the specification would be good for funding, and to highlight directly in the specifications where the project has reflected public/patient requests. | |
| - Great that SATRE involved public, reflect this in the specification would be good for funding, and to highlight directly in the specifications where the project has reflected public/patient requests. |
|
|
||
| ### Summary | ||
|
|
||
| This workshop introduced the idea of TREs within local council work, making specific reference to the London NHS SNSDE, and how Structurizr can be used for rendering C4 diagrams of data architecture. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is Structurizr known enough that is needs no explanaiton to distinguish its name from a typo?
Could add this link for clarity (if this is indeed the right thing) uk-tre/community-management#55
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I hadn't heard of it before. There are several other terms used in the notes (Snowflake, MVP, etc) which will be clear to some people but not others. I've just left them as is.
| - Brief Introduction - subnational NHS SDE | ||
| - The importance of metadata architecture as a foundation to TRE | ||
| - Introduction to C4 model: https://c4model.com/ | ||
| - X |
manics
reviewed
Jan 25, 2024
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-local-cloud-hosting.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-local-cloud-hosting.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-multi-tre.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-multi-tre.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-multi-tre.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| - Introduction to C4 model: https://c4model.com/ | ||
| - X | ||
| - TRE design in HDRC/ local authority: | ||
| - To comply with the data governance, the linked dataset (administrative and NHS data) needs to be stored in data haven that are accrediated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| - To comply with the data governance, the linked dataset (administrative and NHS data) needs to be stored in data haven that are accrediated. | |
| - To comply with the data governance, the linked dataset (administrative and NHS data) needs to be stored in data haven that are accredited. |
| - X | ||
| - TRE design in HDRC/ local authority: | ||
| - To comply with the data governance, the linked dataset (administrative and NHS data) needs to be stored in data haven that are accrediated. | ||
| - Such challenge in data storage and handling make it difficult to facilitate a collaborative research environment under the current data system. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| - Such challenge in data storage and handling make it difficult to facilitate a collaborative research environment under the current data system. | |
| - Such challenges in data storage and handling make it difficult to facilitate a collaborative research environment under the current data system. |
| - TRE design in HDRC/ local authority: | ||
| - To comply with the data governance, the linked dataset (administrative and NHS data) needs to be stored in data haven that are accrediated. | ||
| - Such challenge in data storage and handling make it difficult to facilitate a collaborative research environment under the current data system. | ||
| - AS such, TRE provides a possible solution to offer a playground/ sandbox to allow researchers from council, community, academia and etc. to access and analyse the dataset. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| - AS such, TRE provides a possible solution to offer a playground/ sandbox to allow researchers from council, community, academia and etc. to access and analyse the dataset. | |
| - As such, TRE provides a possible solution to offer a playground/ sandbox to allow researchers from council, community, academia etc. to access and analyse the dataset. |
| - Regional London SDE applies to governance on health data, especially for linking | ||
| - Subnational SDEs not quite ready for this type of research! | ||
| - Usefulness of Structurizr for rendering C4 diagrams of data architecture - as a text based modelling language, you can do your version control with git! - you can incorporate data models (Entity Relations) as images at the lowest "Code" level perspective of diagramming | ||
| 11 |
|
|
||
| The talk then went into detail on the proposed work for the next 4 months. | ||
| This was based on the proposal submitted for the DARE UK Community groups funding. | ||
| More detail can be found in the [our focus section]() |
Co-authored-by: Davsarper <[email protected]>
manics
force-pushed
the
december-report
branch
from
1710118 to
ecb27f4
Compare
manics
reviewed
Jan 30, 2024
manics
reviewed
Jan 30, 2024
|
|
||
| ### Next steps | ||
|
|
||
| - Propose a high-level federation WG (IG?) as an umbrella/place to start, using the UK TRE/DARE UK/RDA model |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I presume Rob will be the one to propose this, or at least will ne heavily involved, so I think we can discuss this separately
|
|
||
| The talk then went into detail on the proposed work for the next 4 months. | ||
| This was based on the proposal submitted for the DARE UK Community groups funding. | ||
| More detail can be found in the [our focus section]() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| More detail can be found in the [our focus section]() |
Shall we take this out, merge, and add it in later?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have suggested to just link to the full proposal
|
Uploaded to Zenodo, pending approval, once I have that will update the link that is missing and slightly rephrase that sentence. Then approve? I think all other conversations are outdated or resolved no? |
Davsarper
reviewed
Jan 31, 2024
Co-authored-by: Davsarper <[email protected]>
Davsarper
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2024
|
This is still marked as draft, what's left to do that can't wait? |
|
With the updated link I think it is ready, admitedly lost track of some suggested changes but I think they are all applied. I would approve, merge, and if we spot anything fix in a new PR |
manics
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2024
|
[heart] David Sarmiento Perez reacted to your message:
…________________________________
From: Simon Li ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 12:01:18 PM
To: uk-tre/website ***@***.***>
Cc: David Sarmiento Perez ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [uk-tre/website] December report (PR #35)
Merged #35<#35> into main.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4LZQ6EMBMNQDXDRAV5TPF3YRIXA5AVCNFSM6AAAAABATQSWGOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJRGY2TIOBRGA4TSOI>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Outstanding actions: