-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
8 changed files
with
55 additions
and
31 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion
4
...ents/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-local-cloud-hosting.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ | ||
# Hosting TRE/SDEs locally vs cloud | ||
|
||
**Chair**: Adam Marsh (Optimum Patient Care) | ||
|
||
## Prompts | ||
|
||
- What is the split (if any) between TRE/SDEs being hosted locally vs cloud? | ||
- What are the merits of either option? | ||
- [assuming there are participants who have hosted locally] Are there any challenges or tips for building and hosting locally? | ||
- [assuming there are participants who have hosted locally] Are there any challenges or tips for building and hosting locally? |
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions
10
docs/events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/discussion-nhs-sde.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
# NHS England’s SDE Network | ||
|
||
**Chair**: Adam Keeley (University of Leeds) | ||
|
||
## Prompts | ||
|
||
- What is the future of independent TREs for health data? | ||
- How will primary data collection and linkage be managed in the SDE network? | ||
- What, if any, will be the accreditation standards SDEs hold them to? | ||
- What are the current options for unmet technical capability? |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion
5
...workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/workshop-automated-output-checking-coi.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@ | ||
# Evaluation of Automated Output Checking and AI Model Risk Assessment Community of Interest | ||
|
||
## Summary | ||
|
||
TBD | ||
|
||
## Preparation | ||
|
||
TBD | ||
|
||
## Target audience | ||
TBD | ||
|
||
TBD |
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions
9
...nts/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/workshop-manual-output-checking.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,19 +1,22 @@ | ||
# Streamlining manual output checking | ||
|
||
**Lead:** Rachael Williams (MHRA) | ||
|
||
## Summary | ||
|
||
This workshop will bring the community together to brainstorm strategies and tools for streamlining manual output checking in TREs. | ||
This workshop will bring the community together to brainstorm strategies and tools for streamlining manual output checking in TREs. | ||
|
||
Whilst automated output checking is going some way to minimising bottlenecks, manual verification is seen by many as a crucial step in maintaining confidentiality and in making sure that outputs align with the intentions of individual projects. | ||
Whilst automated output checking is going some way to minimising bottlenecks, manual verification is seen by many as a crucial step in maintaining confidentiality and in making sure that outputs align with the intentions of individual projects. | ||
This manual step can be time-consuming and prone to errors. | ||
|
||
Participants will brainstorm effective techniques for optimising this process, including best practices to enhance efficiency without compromising governance. | ||
|
||
By the end of the workshop, it is hoped that participants will be equipped with practical insights to enhance the speed and accuracy of manual output checking, ultimately improving the overall research workflow. | ||
|
||
## Preparation | ||
|
||
Please bring your experience, ideas, and questions, around what works and what doesn’t in the world of manual output checking, such as checklist development, collaborative workflows, and quality assurance measures. | ||
|
||
## Target audience | ||
All involved in manual output checking – both from a policy and procedures perspective, and with hands on experience. | ||
|
||
All involved in manual output checking – both from a policy and procedures perspective, and with hands on experience. |
8 changes: 6 additions & 2 deletions
8
...events/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/workshop-package-allow-lists.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,24 +1,28 @@ | ||
# Package allow lists | ||
|
||
**Lead:** Jim Madge (Alan Turing Institute) | ||
|
||
## Summary | ||
|
||
The [packages repository](https://github.com/uk-tre/packages) was created recently as a place for TRE operators to share their decisions on packages allowed in their TREs. | ||
|
||
The lists are structured as JSON documents conforming to a schema, which sets out what information is required. | ||
The lists are structured as JSON documents conforming to a schema, which sets out what information is required. | ||
In this way, the lists can easily be validated and parsed to be used by other tools. | ||
|
||
In the workshop we'll discuss adding your allowlists to the repository, making improvements and building tooling to use the lists. | ||
|
||
We hope that sharing our decisions like this will encourage us to be honest and confident about our security and to benefit from using the data. | ||
|
||
## Preparation | ||
|
||
Attendees are encouraged to look at [the repository](https://github.com/uk-tre/packages) beforehand and bring ideas to the workshop. | ||
|
||
For example, you might want to add your own organisation, you might want to propose a change to the schema, you might want to add tooling to create, modify or analyse the lists. | ||
|
||
A good output would be to open a pull request or issue suggesting improvements. | ||
|
||
## Target audience | ||
|
||
TRE builders and operators with an interest in managing packages in TREs. | ||
|
||
The session will be quite technical - the repository currently uses JSONSchema and Python. | ||
The session will be quite technical - the repository currently uses JSONSchema and Python. |
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion
5
...vents/wg_workshops/2023-12-05-december-meeting/workshop-researcher-passports.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@ | ||
# Researcher Passports | ||
|
||
## Summary | ||
|
||
TBD | ||
|
||
## Preparation | ||
|
||
TBD | ||
|
||
## Target audience | ||
TBD | ||
|
||
TBD |