feat(just): cleanup and standardization of just recipes

[HikariKnight]

Drafting this so we can start a discussion.
Unlike the just reorg done in ublue-os/bazzite#765
Bluefin has way less just recipes so I would like to prod and hear what the reorg needs will be and if the just files should be split up in groups like we did in bazzite.

In bazzite we focused on merging together recipes that involved the same thing under the configure- and setup- verbs.

• configure for things that already exist on the image
• setup for anything that would require installation before configuring. (we also have install-foo for anything that just installs without any configuration or removal steps)

shortcuts like ujust benchmark would stay as they are however i can merge all the ujust zsh|fish|bash into ujust configure-shell with an alias named ujust shell

Other than this there does not seem to be anything else to do other than just some minor cleanup and change recipes to follow the standard we decided on in ublue-os/config#181

[m2Giles]

Shells:
I think we have multiple just commands for switching default using various methods. Maybe make this one command and have a selector between them?

Configuration:
We don't have a lot of common verbiage. Most seem to be one direction setups. For one direction I think setup would be good verbiage. Toggles could be configure.

Overall we probably have a lot of things that could be removed. We also should consider not in lining so much stuff.

[castrojo]

Maybe make this one command and have a selector between them?

This would be great for shells!

[HikariKnight]

Currently since there have not been any verbs before on anything, i have left in aliases to the old recipe names so that you all can remove them when the time is right for it

But i have updated everything (that made sense to update) to use the verbs we agreed on in the config repo.
i put gnome-vrr as toggle- but i can switch it to configure- if that makes more sense since it is the only toggle in the system (other than devmode, but i feel devmode is important enough to be kept without a verb)

[m2Giles]

Left a few comments. Overall looks solid

[m2Giles]

I get that we may want to do this, but instead of copying over, maybe a symlink might make more sense? This might be a change we need to do on our /etc/profile.d/brew.sh

If that's a file then the user has modified, if it's a symlink we won't have to update? Since this prompt doesn't go away, I would want to avoid overwriting user changes.

[HikariKnight]

Can change that, i think @bketelsen wrote that originally, might be a reason why it is not a symlink instead.
Will wait for them to reply before making that change though, but i am pretty sure a symlink will be fine.

[bketelsen]

no reason, symlink is a great idea. please proceed!

[m2Giles]

We'll wrap up the brew symlink in another PR. LGTM.